Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma of the Extremities and Trunk: A Retrospective Analysis of a Mono-Institutional Series.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1159/000540613
Giuseppe Bianchi, Maria Antonella Laginestra, Elisa Simonetti, Toni Ibrahim, Fabiana Macrì, Federico Ostetto, Gianmarco Tuzzato, Anna Paioli, Marco Gambarotti, Stefania Cocchi, Davide Maria Donati, Katia Scotlandi, Roberta Laranga
{"title":"Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma of the Extremities and Trunk: A Retrospective Analysis of a Mono-Institutional Series.","authors":"Giuseppe Bianchi, Maria Antonella Laginestra, Elisa Simonetti, Toni Ibrahim, Fabiana Macrì, Federico Ostetto, Gianmarco Tuzzato, Anna Paioli, Marco Gambarotti, Stefania Cocchi, Davide Maria Donati, Katia Scotlandi, Roberta Laranga","doi":"10.1159/000540613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EEwS) is a rare malignant tumor, and current international recommendations indicate systemic and local treatment like bone Ewing sarcoma (BEwS); to the best of our knowledge, very few studies tried to explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of this tumor, and the most appropriate treatment strategy remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 35 EEwS cases enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna, Italy, between 1988-2022. We performed RNA sequencing in 18 Ewing sarcoma cases, including 12 BEwSs and 6 EEwSs. We analyzed overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) and the risk factors associated to survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unsupervised hierarchical clustering showed no differences in the transcriptional profile between EEwS and BEwS. Five-year OS was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47-80), 5-year LRFS was 61% (95% CI: 43-75), and 5-year MFS was 55% (95% CI: 38-70). Recurrent tumors, larger than 8 cm, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum value resulted to be negative prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding/detection of a genetic profile that is indistinguishable between EEwS and BEwS confirms the view that the two subgroups belong to the same tumor entity and supports the use of a single therapeutic approach for Ewing sarcoma, regardless of the site of origin. Statistical evaluation showed that size bigger than 8 cm, elevated LDH, and recurrent tumors had a worse prognosis, suggesting a risk-stratification method for identifying patients for specific therapy treatment. However, larger, multicenter, prospective trials are called for to validate our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"496-508"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EEwS) is a rare malignant tumor, and current international recommendations indicate systemic and local treatment like bone Ewing sarcoma (BEwS); to the best of our knowledge, very few studies tried to explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of this tumor, and the most appropriate treatment strategy remains uncertain.

Methods: We reviewed 35 EEwS cases enrolled at Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna, Italy, between 1988-2022. We performed RNA sequencing in 18 Ewing sarcoma cases, including 12 BEwSs and 6 EEwSs. We analyzed overall survival (OS), local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) and the risk factors associated to survival.

Results: Unsupervised hierarchical clustering showed no differences in the transcriptional profile between EEwS and BEwS. Five-year OS was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47-80), 5-year LRFS was 61% (95% CI: 43-75), and 5-year MFS was 55% (95% CI: 38-70). Recurrent tumors, larger than 8 cm, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum value resulted to be negative prognostic factors.

Conclusions: The finding/detection of a genetic profile that is indistinguishable between EEwS and BEwS confirms the view that the two subgroups belong to the same tumor entity and supports the use of a single therapeutic approach for Ewing sarcoma, regardless of the site of origin. Statistical evaluation showed that size bigger than 8 cm, elevated LDH, and recurrent tumors had a worse prognosis, suggesting a risk-stratification method for identifying patients for specific therapy treatment. However, larger, multicenter, prospective trials are called for to validate our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四肢和躯干骨骼外尤文肉瘤:对单个机构系列病例的回顾性分析。
导言:骨外尤文肉瘤是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,目前国际上的建议是像骨尤文肉瘤一样进行全身和局部治疗;据我们所知,很少有研究试图探索这种肿瘤的临床和遗传特征,最合适的治疗策略仍不确定。方法 我们回顾了意大利博洛尼亚里佐利骨科研究所 1988-2022 年间登记的 35 例骨骼外尤文肉瘤(EEwS)病例。我们对 18 例尤文肉瘤进行了 RNA 测序,其中包括 12 例骨尤文肉瘤(BEwS)和 6 例 EEwS。我们分析了总生存率(OS)、无局部复发生存率(LRFS)和无转移生存率(MFS)以及与生存率相关的风险因素。结果 无监督层次聚类显示,EEwS和BEwS的转录谱无差异。5年OS为67%(95%CI 47-80),5年LRFS为61%(95%CI 43-75),5年MFS为55%(95%CI 38-70)。肿瘤复发、大于 8 厘米和 LDH 血清值升高是预后不良的因素。结论 EEwS和BEwS的遗传特征没有区别,这证实了将这两个亚组归入同一肿瘤实体的观点,并支持对尤文肉瘤采用单一的治疗方法,而不受起源部位的影响。统计评估显示,肿瘤大小超过8厘米、LDH升高和复发的肿瘤预后较差,这表明有一种风险分级方法可用于识别接受特定治疗的患者。不过,还需要更大规模的多中心前瞻性试验来验证我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
期刊最新文献
Survivorship in CAR T-cell Therapy Recipients: Infections, Secondary Malignancies, and Non-Relapse Mortality. Palbociclib in combination with either aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant for patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany - Final results of the phase 2 multicohort INGE-B trial. ONKOPEDIA guideline updates "in a nutshell" for the readers of Oncology Research and Treatment. Sex-disaggregated analysis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with cancer. Standardizing Nutritional Care for Cancer Patients: Implementation and Evaluation of a Malnutrition Risk Screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1