Impact of epidural anesthesia on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer - results of a propensity score matched analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1159/000543540
Valerie Catherine Linz, Marco Johannes Battista, Regina Hummel, Markus Schepers, Eva-Verena Griemert, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Marcus Schmidt, Annette Hasenburg, Katharina Gillen
{"title":"Impact of epidural anesthesia on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer - results of a propensity score matched analysis.","authors":"Valerie Catherine Linz, Marco Johannes Battista, Regina Hummel, Markus Schepers, Eva-Verena Griemert, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Marcus Schmidt, Annette Hasenburg, Katharina Gillen","doi":"10.1159/000543540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epidural anesthesia is a standard procedure to mitigate pain during surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). Little data exist about the influence of epidural anesthesia on the oncological outcome in elderly patients with EC. This retrospective study aims to investigate potential correlations between epidural anesthesia and cancer recurrence in patients with EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened the medical records of patients ≥ 60 years treated surgically for EC at the University Medical Center Mainz between January 2008 and December 2019. All women underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone or combined with epidural anesthesia (EGA). Cox regression, the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching were used to analyze the prognostic influence of the anesthesiologic regime on survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 women with EC were included. 29 patients (19.1%) formed the EGA cohort. The median time of follow-up (FU) was 31 months [interquartile range (IQR): 8-67.5]. The EGA cohort showed more in-hospital complications (27.6 vs. 8.9%; p=0.006), especially thromboembolic events (3 vs. 0 events; p=0.006), as well as a longer hospital stay (11 (IQR: 8-13) vs. 7 (IQR: 4-9) days; p <0.001). 26 patients (17.1%) developed a recurrence in the follow-up at a median of 13 months [IQR: 7.75-29.5]. 32 patients died during FU (21.1%). The EGA cohort showed higher FIGO stages and a higher histological grading than the GA cohort. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, EGA showed a significantly reduced 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36.5% vs. 72.6%, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (58.6% vs. 79.9%, p=0.008). However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis including FIGO stages and histological grading, EGA did not influence RFS (HR: 2.02; 95%-CI [0.99-4.12], p=0.054), and OS (HR: 1.03; 95%-CI [0.40-2.66], p=0.951). This was backed up by the propensity score matched analysis for survival (RFS: p=0.604, OS: p=0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering risk factors, epidural anesthesia in combination with GA did not differ in recurrence-free and overall survival compared to GA. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to further evaluate this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epidural anesthesia is a standard procedure to mitigate pain during surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). Little data exist about the influence of epidural anesthesia on the oncological outcome in elderly patients with EC. This retrospective study aims to investigate potential correlations between epidural anesthesia and cancer recurrence in patients with EC.

Methods: We screened the medical records of patients ≥ 60 years treated surgically for EC at the University Medical Center Mainz between January 2008 and December 2019. All women underwent general anesthesia (GA) alone or combined with epidural anesthesia (EGA). Cox regression, the Kaplan-Meier method and propensity score matching were used to analyze the prognostic influence of the anesthesiologic regime on survival.

Results: A total of 152 women with EC were included. 29 patients (19.1%) formed the EGA cohort. The median time of follow-up (FU) was 31 months [interquartile range (IQR): 8-67.5]. The EGA cohort showed more in-hospital complications (27.6 vs. 8.9%; p=0.006), especially thromboembolic events (3 vs. 0 events; p=0.006), as well as a longer hospital stay (11 (IQR: 8-13) vs. 7 (IQR: 4-9) days; p <0.001). 26 patients (17.1%) developed a recurrence in the follow-up at a median of 13 months [IQR: 7.75-29.5]. 32 patients died during FU (21.1%). The EGA cohort showed higher FIGO stages and a higher histological grading than the GA cohort. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, EGA showed a significantly reduced 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (36.5% vs. 72.6%, p<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (58.6% vs. 79.9%, p=0.008). However, in multivariate Cox regression analysis including FIGO stages and histological grading, EGA did not influence RFS (HR: 2.02; 95%-CI [0.99-4.12], p=0.054), and OS (HR: 1.03; 95%-CI [0.40-2.66], p=0.951). This was backed up by the propensity score matched analysis for survival (RFS: p=0.604, OS: p=0.86).

Conclusion: Considering risk factors, epidural anesthesia in combination with GA did not differ in recurrence-free and overall survival compared to GA. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to further evaluate this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.
期刊最新文献
Improving Accuracy and Source Transparency in Responses to Soft Tissue Sarcoma Queries using GPT-4o Enhanced with German Evidence-Based Guidelines. Modifications to prostate cancer diagnosis following COVID-19 and following models. Impact of epidural anesthesia on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer - results of a propensity score matched analysis. Liquid Biopsy in early breast cancer Will minimal residual disease monitoring be part of routine surveillance? Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes, CAR-, and T Cell Receptor- Modified T Cells in Solid Cancer Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1