Kerstin Pfister, Henning Schäffler, Sophia Huesmann, Sabine Heublein, Tatjana Braun, Stefan Lukac, Kristina Veselinovic, Franziska Mergel, Thomas W P Friedl, Brigitte Rack, Wolfgang Janni, Angelina Fink
{"title":"Liquid Biopsy in early breast cancer Will minimal residual disease monitoring be part of routine surveillance?","authors":"Kerstin Pfister, Henning Schäffler, Sophia Huesmann, Sabine Heublein, Tatjana Braun, Stefan Lukac, Kristina Veselinovic, Franziska Mergel, Thomas W P Friedl, Brigitte Rack, Wolfgang Janni, Angelina Fink","doi":"10.1159/000544838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current breast cancer (BC) surveillance is limited to the detection of local, locoregional or contralateral recurrence. This is based on two outdated studies from the 1990s and ignores current evidence on liquid biopsies, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>ctDNA has been shown to be a reliable prognostic biomarker in early BC surveillance. It can be detected using a tumor-informed or a tumor-agnostic approach. However, conclusive evidence for a survival benefit from ctDNA-guided follow-up, as needed for a paradigm shift in BC surveillance, is still lacking. According to current studies, the lead time, i.e. the time from biomarker detection to clinically overt relapse, can be up to several months. This stage of MRD (minimal or molecular residual disease) offers a new therapeutic window, and, currently, several studies are evaluating the efficacy of treatments initiated within this therapeutic window, based on a positive biomarker finding. Liquid biopsy might also open up the possibility of de-escalating therapy in patients with a negative biomarker result.</p>","PeriodicalId":19543,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544838","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current breast cancer (BC) surveillance is limited to the detection of local, locoregional or contralateral recurrence. This is based on two outdated studies from the 1990s and ignores current evidence on liquid biopsies, particularly circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Summary: ctDNA has been shown to be a reliable prognostic biomarker in early BC surveillance. It can be detected using a tumor-informed or a tumor-agnostic approach. However, conclusive evidence for a survival benefit from ctDNA-guided follow-up, as needed for a paradigm shift in BC surveillance, is still lacking. According to current studies, the lead time, i.e. the time from biomarker detection to clinically overt relapse, can be up to several months. This stage of MRD (minimal or molecular residual disease) offers a new therapeutic window, and, currently, several studies are evaluating the efficacy of treatments initiated within this therapeutic window, based on a positive biomarker finding. Liquid biopsy might also open up the possibility of de-escalating therapy in patients with a negative biomarker result.
期刊介绍:
With the first issue in 2014, the journal ''Onkologie'' has changed its title to ''Oncology Research and Treatment''. By this change, publisher and editor set the scene for the further development of this interdisciplinary journal. The English title makes it clear that the articles are published in English – a logical step for the journal, which is listed in all relevant international databases. For excellent manuscripts, a ''Fast Track'' was introduced: The review is carried out within 2 weeks; after acceptance the papers are published online within 14 days and immediately released as ''Editor’s Choice'' to provide the authors with maximum visibility of their results. Interesting case reports are published in the section ''Novel Insights from Clinical Practice'' which clearly highlights the scientific advances which the report presents.