Investigating a Train-the-Trainer Model of Supervision and Peer Review for Child Interviewers in Canadian Police Services

IF 1.7 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1007/s11896-024-09696-5
Sonja P. Brubacher, Meredith Kirkland-Burke, Valarie Gates, Martine B. Powell
{"title":"Investigating a Train-the-Trainer Model of Supervision and Peer Review for Child Interviewers in Canadian Police Services","authors":"Sonja P. Brubacher, Meredith Kirkland-Burke, Valarie Gates, Martine B. Powell","doi":"10.1007/s11896-024-09696-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This project, conducted in one Canadian province, investigated whether a train-the-trainer model of supervision and peer review could improve the interviewing skills of police officers new to interviewing children. At 6 police services, 2 “interview specialists” were chosen by criteria (e.g. having conducted &gt; 30 interviews with children), commitment (minimum 2 years to project), and performance evaluation of a mock and field interview. Specialists received additional training on leading group peer review and individual supervision. They carried out these activities over a 9-month period with 3–4 trainees (new interviewers) per site. Trainees’ interview performance was evaluated with mock and field interviews pre and post intervention. Qualitative interviews about project feasibility were carried out with the specialists at the end of the project, and the results of those interviews comprise the focus of this paper. At the time of the qualitative interviews, only 9 specialists and 5 sites remained in the project. Their interviews revealed that organizational buy-in was critical theme. Other emergent themes were that (different) training is needed for all levels of interviewing experience including interview specialists, that peer review formats are not one-size-fits-all across services, and that fostering a culture of peer review enhances cohesion. </p>","PeriodicalId":46605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-024-09696-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project, conducted in one Canadian province, investigated whether a train-the-trainer model of supervision and peer review could improve the interviewing skills of police officers new to interviewing children. At 6 police services, 2 “interview specialists” were chosen by criteria (e.g. having conducted > 30 interviews with children), commitment (minimum 2 years to project), and performance evaluation of a mock and field interview. Specialists received additional training on leading group peer review and individual supervision. They carried out these activities over a 9-month period with 3–4 trainees (new interviewers) per site. Trainees’ interview performance was evaluated with mock and field interviews pre and post intervention. Qualitative interviews about project feasibility were carried out with the specialists at the end of the project, and the results of those interviews comprise the focus of this paper. At the time of the qualitative interviews, only 9 specialists and 5 sites remained in the project. Their interviews revealed that organizational buy-in was critical theme. Other emergent themes were that (different) training is needed for all levels of interviewing experience including interview specialists, that peer review formats are not one-size-fits-all across services, and that fostering a culture of peer review enhances cohesion. 

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查加拿大警察部门儿童访谈员监督和同行评审的培训员培训模式
该项目在加拿大某省开展,调查了监督和同行评议的 "培训培训师 "模式是否能提高初次与儿童面谈的警官的面谈技能。6 个警察局根据标准(例如,与儿童进行过 30 次面谈)、承诺(参与项目至少 2 年)以及模拟面谈和实地面谈的绩效评估,选出了 2 名 "面谈专家"。专家们还接受了领导小组互评和个人监督方面的额外培训。他们在 9 个月的时间里开展了这些活动,每个地点有 3-4 名受训人员(新访谈员)。通过干预前后的模拟访谈和实地访谈,对受训人员的访谈表现进行了评估。在项目结束时,与专家们就项目的可行性进行了定性访谈,访谈结果是本文的重点。在进行定性访谈时,项目只剩下 9 名专家和 5 个地点。对他们的访谈显示,组织认同是关键主题。其他新出现的主题包括:需要对包括访谈专家在内的所有级别的访谈经验进行(不同的)培训;同行评审的形式不能一刀切;培养同行评审文化可以增强凝聚力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal that reports research findings regarding the theory, practice and application of psychological issues in the criminal justice context, namely law enforcement, courts, and corrections. The Journal encourages submissions focusing on Police Psychology including personnel assessment, therapeutic methods, training, ethics and effective organizational operation. The Journal also welcomes articles that focus on criminal behavior and the application of psychology to effective correctional practices and facilitating recovery among victims of crime. Consumers of and contributors to this body of research include psychologists, criminologists, sociologists, legal experts, social workers, and other professionals representing various facets of the criminal justice system, both domestic and international.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the Gap: Isolating Observable Signs of Cognitive Impairment in Police-Public Interactions Does Shift Work Affect Burnout and Sleep Quality Among Australian Police Officers? Statistical Literacy in the Police: Handling Statistical Information and Using it for Risk Assessments Investigating a Train-the-Trainer Model of Supervision and Peer Review for Child Interviewers in Canadian Police Services “There Is No Script”: Police Teachers’ Experiences of Training Investigative Interviewing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1