Sperm concentration remains stable among fertile American men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.322
Kieran Lewis, Rossella Cannarella, Fangzhou Liu, Bradley Roth, Leila Bushweller, Jack Millot, Sohei Kuribayashi, Shinnosuke Kuroda, Diego Aguilar Palacios, Sarah C Vij, Jennifer Cullen, Scott D Lundy
{"title":"Sperm concentration remains stable among fertile American men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kieran Lewis, Rossella Cannarella, Fangzhou Liu, Bradley Roth, Leila Bushweller, Jack Millot, Sohei Kuribayashi, Shinnosuke Kuroda, Diego Aguilar Palacios, Sarah C Vij, Jennifer Cullen, Scott D Lundy","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Findings from several high profile meta-analyses have raised concerns about an ongoing global decline in sperm concentration and male fertility. However, these studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity in key variables including study population, methodology, fertility status, and geographic region.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring temporal trends in sperm concentration among fertile men and men unselected for fertility status in the United States.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature search performed in Scopus and PubMed databases for studies published between 1970 and 2023. Additional studies were included from citations of prior global meta-analyses and reviews evaluating temporal trends in sperm count.</p><p><strong>Study selection and synthesis: </strong>Studies were included if they presented original data on sperm concentration in US men without known infertility from 1970 to 2023. Aggregate data were assessed across all study populations, with additional subgroup analyses stratified by fertility status and US region.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes: </strong>Weighted generalized linear models were generated to evaluate the association between mean sperm concentration and sample collection year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 874 articles were screened, with 58 meeting the inclusion criteria. These represented 75 unique study populations totaling 11,787 men in the United States. Across all study populations, no change in sperm concentration was observed between 1970 and 2018 in unadjusted models (β = 0.14 million/mL per year). When adjusting for US region, no statistically significant decline in sperm concentration was seen. When adjusting for both region and fertility status, a modest annual decline was observed to meet statistical significance (β = -0.35 million/mL per year). Of the 49 study populations reporting adequate data to determine mean total sperm count, there was a significant increase in total sperm count of 2.9 million per year between 1970 and 2018. Subgroup analysis found no statistically significant change in mean sperm concentration among any US census region or fertility status cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>In contrast to prior global studies, this analysis suggests no clinically significant decline in sperm concentration among confirmed fertile men and the general male US population without known infertility. Although these findings provide some reassurance against a widespread rapid decline, further studies are necessary to better understand this important topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":" ","pages":"77-87"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Findings from several high profile meta-analyses have raised concerns about an ongoing global decline in sperm concentration and male fertility. However, these studies exhibit considerable heterogeneity in key variables including study population, methodology, fertility status, and geographic region.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring temporal trends in sperm concentration among fertile men and men unselected for fertility status in the United States.

Data sources: A literature search performed in Scopus and PubMed databases for studies published between 1970 and 2023. Additional studies were included from citations of prior global meta-analyses and reviews evaluating temporal trends in sperm count.

Study selection and synthesis: Studies were included if they presented original data on sperm concentration in US men without known infertility from 1970 to 2023. Aggregate data were assessed across all study populations, with additional subgroup analyses stratified by fertility status and US region.

Main outcomes: Weighted generalized linear models were generated to evaluate the association between mean sperm concentration and sample collection year.

Results: A total of 874 articles were screened, with 58 meeting the inclusion criteria. These represented 75 unique study populations totaling 11,787 men in the United States. Across all study populations, no change in sperm concentration was observed between 1970 and 2018 in unadjusted models (β = 0.14 million/mL per year). When adjusting for US region, no statistically significant decline in sperm concentration was seen. When adjusting for both region and fertility status, a modest annual decline was observed to meet statistical significance (β = -0.35 million/mL per year). Of the 49 study populations reporting adequate data to determine mean total sperm count, there was a significant increase in total sperm count of 2.9 million per year between 1970 and 2018. Subgroup analysis found no statistically significant change in mean sperm concentration among any US census region or fertility status cohort.

Conclusion and relevance: In contrast to prior global studies, this analysis suggests no clinically significant decline in sperm concentration among confirmed fertile men and the general male US population without known infertility. Although these findings provide some reassurance against a widespread rapid decline, further studies are necessary to better understand this important topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有生育能力的美国男性精子浓度保持稳定:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性:几项备受瞩目的荟萃分析结果引发了人们对全球精子浓度和男性生育能力持续下降的担忧。然而,这些研究在研究人群、方法、生育状况和地理区域等关键变量方面表现出相当大的异质性:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨美国可育男性和未选择生育状况的男性精子浓度的时间趋势:在 Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中对 1970-2023 年间发表的研究进行文献检索。此外,还从先前的全球荟萃分析和评估精子数量时间趋势的综述中纳入了其他研究。研究选择与综合:如果研究提供了 1970 年至 2023 年美国男性精子浓度的原始数据,且未发现不育症,则纳入研究。对所有研究人群的总体数据进行评估,并根据生育状况和美国地区进行分组分析:主要结果:建立了加权广义线性模型,以评估平均精子浓度与样本采集年份之间的关系:结果:共筛选出 874 篇文章,其中 58 篇符合纳入标准。在所有研究人群中,在未经调整的模型中,1970-2018年间精子浓度没有变化(β=0.14百万/毫升/年,P=0.42)。根据美国地区进行调整后,精子浓度没有出现统计学意义上的显著下降。当对地区和生育状况进行调整后,观察到每年的适度下降达到了统计学意义(β=-0.35百万/毫升/年,p=0.04)。在 49 个报告了足够数据以确定平均总精子数的研究人群中,1970 年至 2018 年间,总精子数显著增加了 290 万/年(p=0.03)。亚组分析发现,在任何美国人口普查地区或生育状况队列中,平均精子浓度均无统计学意义上的显著变化:与之前的全球研究不同,本分析表明,在已确认有生育能力的男性和没有已知不育症的普通美国男性人群中,精子浓度没有临床意义上的显著下降。尽管这些发现为防止精子浓度普遍快速下降提供了一些保证,但仍有必要开展进一步研究,以更好地了解这一重要课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sleep variability and time to achieving pregnancy: findings from a pilot cohort study of women desiring pregnancy. Erratum to "Higher live birth rates are associated with a normal body mass index in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System study" [Fertil Steril 2024;121:291-98]. Accessory uterine cavities: a review of cases and an appeal for standard terminology. Robotic-Assisted Neovaginal Creation: Stepwise Approach to the Davydov Technique in a Patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome. Systemic Progesterone Optimizes Programmed FET Outcomes: The Only Level I Evidence Still Indicates Intramuscular (IM) Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1