{"title":"Caffeoylhexaric acids in Inuleae: A case study of Geigeria alata, Inula helenium, and Telekia speciosa","authors":"Aleksandra Stefanova , Reneta Gevrenova , Vessela Balabanova , Vesela Lozanova , Ralitsa Alexova , Dimitrina Zheleva-Dimitrova","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the present study, the caffeoylhexaric acids in Inuleae species of Asteraceae family as G<em>eigeria alata</em> Benth. & Hook.f. ex Oliv., <em>Inula helenium</em> L. and <em>Telekia speciosa</em> (Schreb.) Baumg. were profiled by ultra-high performance – liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry. In the root methanol-aqueous extracts, 32 caffeoylhexaric acids were annotated. A variety of mono-, di-, tri- and terta-caffeoylhexaric acids, as well as their propionyl, isobutyryl, hydroxypropionyl, methylbutyryl/isovaleryl, hydroxybutyryl- and others derivatives were tentatively identified<em>.</em> The study is the first attempt to propose a fragmentation key of caffeoylhexaric acids derivatives by LC-HRMS. The chemophenetic significance of these compounds was discussed based on the results and literature data. The identification of leontopodic acid A and B in the studied Inuleae species highlighted <em>T. speciosa</em> as a new source of caffeoyl-D-glucaric acid derivatives, natural compounds with health-benefit promotion and cosmetic application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 104873"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824000917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present study, the caffeoylhexaric acids in Inuleae species of Asteraceae family as Geigeria alata Benth. & Hook.f. ex Oliv., Inula helenium L. and Telekia speciosa (Schreb.) Baumg. were profiled by ultra-high performance – liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry. In the root methanol-aqueous extracts, 32 caffeoylhexaric acids were annotated. A variety of mono-, di-, tri- and terta-caffeoylhexaric acids, as well as their propionyl, isobutyryl, hydroxypropionyl, methylbutyryl/isovaleryl, hydroxybutyryl- and others derivatives were tentatively identified. The study is the first attempt to propose a fragmentation key of caffeoylhexaric acids derivatives by LC-HRMS. The chemophenetic significance of these compounds was discussed based on the results and literature data. The identification of leontopodic acid A and B in the studied Inuleae species highlighted T. speciosa as a new source of caffeoyl-D-glucaric acid derivatives, natural compounds with health-benefit promotion and cosmetic application.
期刊介绍:
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology).
In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.