Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators

IF 2.2 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Current Research in Insect Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cris.2024.100093
Fabrice Requier , Myriam Abdelli , Mathilde Baude , David Genoud , Hadrien Gens , Benoît Geslin , Mickaël Henry , Lise Ropars
{"title":"Neglecting non-bee pollinators may lead to substantial underestimation of competition risk among pollinators","authors":"Fabrice Requier ,&nbsp;Myriam Abdelli ,&nbsp;Mathilde Baude ,&nbsp;David Genoud ,&nbsp;Hadrien Gens ,&nbsp;Benoît Geslin ,&nbsp;Mickaël Henry ,&nbsp;Lise Ropars","doi":"10.1016/j.cris.2024.100093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Due to the increasing pressures on bees, many beekeepers currently wish to move their managed livestock of <em>Apis mellifera</em> into little disturbed ecosystems such as protected natural areas. This may, however, exert detrimental competitive effects upon local wild pollinators. While it appears critical for land managers to get an adequate knowledge of this issue for effective wildlife conservation schemes, the frequency of this competition is not clear to date. Based on a systematic literature review of 96 studies, we assessed the frequency of exploitative competition between honey bees and wild pollinators. We found that 78% of the studies highlighted exploitative competition from honey bees to wild pollinators. Importantly, these studies have mostly explored competition with wild bees, while only 18% of them considered other pollinator taxa such as ants, beetles, bugs, butterflies, flies, moths, and wasps. The integration of non-bee pollinators into scientific studies and conservation plans is urgently required as they are critical for the pollination of many wild plants and crops. Interestingly, we found that a majority (88%) of these studies considering also non-bee pollinators report evidence of competition. Thus, neglecting non-bee pollinators could imply an underestimation of competition risks from honey bees. More inclusive work is needed to estimate the risks of competition in its entirety, but also to apprehend the context-dependency of competition so as to properly inform wildlife conservation schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34629,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Insect Science","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000234/pdfft?md5=1362dc76b516bde790e0bb787dd6593a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666515824000234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515824000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the increasing pressures on bees, many beekeepers currently wish to move their managed livestock of Apis mellifera into little disturbed ecosystems such as protected natural areas. This may, however, exert detrimental competitive effects upon local wild pollinators. While it appears critical for land managers to get an adequate knowledge of this issue for effective wildlife conservation schemes, the frequency of this competition is not clear to date. Based on a systematic literature review of 96 studies, we assessed the frequency of exploitative competition between honey bees and wild pollinators. We found that 78% of the studies highlighted exploitative competition from honey bees to wild pollinators. Importantly, these studies have mostly explored competition with wild bees, while only 18% of them considered other pollinator taxa such as ants, beetles, bugs, butterflies, flies, moths, and wasps. The integration of non-bee pollinators into scientific studies and conservation plans is urgently required as they are critical for the pollination of many wild plants and crops. Interestingly, we found that a majority (88%) of these studies considering also non-bee pollinators report evidence of competition. Thus, neglecting non-bee pollinators could imply an underestimation of competition risks from honey bees. More inclusive work is needed to estimate the risks of competition in its entirety, but also to apprehend the context-dependency of competition so as to properly inform wildlife conservation schemes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
忽视非蜜蜂授粉者可能会导致大大低估授粉者之间的竞争风险
由于蜜蜂面临的压力越来越大,许多养蜂人目前希望将其管理的蜂群迁移到自然保护区等干扰较少的生态系统中。然而,这可能会对当地野生授粉昆虫产生不利的竞争影响。对于土地管理者来说,充分了解这一问题似乎是有效保护野生动物计划的关键,但迄今为止,这种竞争的频率尚不清楚。基于对 96 项研究的系统性文献回顾,我们评估了蜜蜂与野生授粉昆虫之间的剥削性竞争的频率。我们发现,78%的研究强调了蜜蜂对野生授粉昆虫的利用性竞争。重要的是,这些研究大多探讨了与野生蜜蜂的竞争,只有18%的研究考虑了其他授粉类群,如蚂蚁、甲虫、虫、蝴蝶、苍蝇、飞蛾和黄蜂。将非蜜蜂授粉者纳入科学研究和保护计划刻不容缓,因为它们对许多野生植物和农作物的授粉至关重要。有趣的是,我们发现大多数(88%)考虑到非蜜蜂传粉昆虫的研究都报告了竞争的证据。因此,忽略非蜜蜂授粉者可能意味着低估了蜜蜂的竞争风险。我们需要开展更广泛的工作,以全面估算竞争风险,同时理解竞争的环境依赖性,从而为野生动物保护计划提供正确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Research in Insect Science
Current Research in Insect Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 days
期刊最新文献
The nutritional dimension of facultative bacterial symbiosis in aphids: Current status and methodological considerations for future research Diapause survival requires a temperature-sensitive preparatory period Identification of a receptor for the sex pheromone of the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus Response of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) genotypes to natural infestation by scale insect pest Stictococcus vayssierei Richard (Hemiptera: Stictococcidae) An enigmatic Cretaceous beetle with possible affinity to Erotylidae (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1