How GPs can help young people avoid future self-harm: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0209
Faraz Mughal, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Ellen Townsend, Christopher J Armitage, Martyn Lewis, Benjamin Saunders
{"title":"How GPs can help young people avoid future self-harm: a qualitative study.","authors":"Faraz Mughal, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Ellen Townsend, Christopher J Armitage, Martyn Lewis, Benjamin Saunders","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm is a growing problem in young people. GPs are usually the first point of healthcare contact for young people aged 16-25 years, after self-harm. GPs can experience barriers to supporting young people and behaviour change theory can help to understand these, and the influences on, GP behaviour.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (COM-B model of behaviour) of GPs, and their perceived training needs, to help young people aged 16-25 years avoid future self-harm.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This was a qualitative study of GPs in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with NHS GPs who were purposively sampled. Interviews occurred in 2021. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and mapped onto the COM-B model domains. The study's patient and public involvement group supported data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen interviews were completed. Four themes were generated. GPs described mixed capabilities, with many feeling they had the physical and psychological skills to support young people to avoid future self-harm, but some felt doing so was emotionally tiring. GPs identified opportunities to better support young people, such as use of electronic consultation tools, but cited lack of time as a concern. GPs reported motivation to help young people, but this can be influenced by their workload. Unmet training needs around communication, knowledge, and optimising safety were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs are supported by their practice teams to support young people after self-harm, but a lack of time hinders opportunities to do so. Future effective GP-led interventions may improve GP motivation to support young people after self-harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0209","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-harm is a growing problem in young people. GPs are usually the first point of healthcare contact for young people aged 16-25 years, after self-harm. GPs can experience barriers to supporting young people and behaviour change theory can help to understand these, and the influences on, GP behaviour.

Aim: To explore the capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (COM-B model of behaviour) of GPs, and their perceived training needs, to help young people aged 16-25 years avoid future self-harm.

Design and setting: This was a qualitative study of GPs in England.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with NHS GPs who were purposively sampled. Interviews occurred in 2021. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and mapped onto the COM-B model domains. The study's patient and public involvement group supported data analysis.

Results: Fifteen interviews were completed. Four themes were generated. GPs described mixed capabilities, with many feeling they had the physical and psychological skills to support young people to avoid future self-harm, but some felt doing so was emotionally tiring. GPs identified opportunities to better support young people, such as use of electronic consultation tools, but cited lack of time as a concern. GPs reported motivation to help young people, but this can be influenced by their workload. Unmet training needs around communication, knowledge, and optimising safety were identified.

Conclusion: GPs are supported by their practice teams to support young people after self-harm, but a lack of time hinders opportunities to do so. Future effective GP-led interventions may improve GP motivation to support young people after self-harm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生如何帮助青少年避免未来的自我伤害?
背景自残是青少年中一个日益严重的问题。全科医生(GPs)通常是 16-25 岁年轻人自我伤害后的第一个医疗接触点。全科医生在为年轻人提供支持时可能会遇到障碍,行为改变理论有助于了解这些障碍以及对全科医生行为的影响。目的 探索并了解全科医生的能力、机会和动机(COM-B),以及他们认为需要进行的培训,以帮助 16-25 岁的年轻人避免未来的自我伤害。方法 对全科医生进行半结构式访谈,并采用目的性抽样,以获得不同的样本。访谈于 2021 年进行。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析,并将其映射到 COM-B 模型中。患者和公众参与研究小组以及实践社区小组为数据分析提供了支持。结果 完成了 15 次访谈(平均持续时间为 38 分钟)。全科医生的能力参差不齐,许多人认为他们拥有支持青少年避免未来自我伤害的生理和心理技能,但也有一些人认为这样做在情感上很累。全科医生认为有机会更好地为年轻人提供支持,例如使用电子咨询工具,但他们担心时间不够。全科医生表示有动力帮助年轻人,但这受到他们日常工作量的影响。在沟通、知识和优化安全方面的培训需求尚未得到满足。结论 未来以全科医生为主导的干预措施需要提高全科医生的能力、机会和动力,以支持年轻人避免未来的自我伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme uptake, patient satisfaction, and QOF achievement: an ecological study from 2020-2023. Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020). Improving personal continuity in general practice: a focus group study. The association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study. Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1