Supercomputing in the biological sciences: Toward Zettascale and Yottascale simulations

IF 6.1 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Current opinion in structural biology Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102889
Karissa Sanbonmatsu
{"title":"Supercomputing in the biological sciences: Toward Zettascale and Yottascale simulations","authors":"Karissa Sanbonmatsu","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Molecular simulations of biological systems tend to be significantly more compute-intensive than those in materials science and astrophysics, due to important contributions of long-range electrostatic forces and large numbers of time steps (&gt;1E9) required. Simulations of biomolecular complexes of microseconds to milliseconds are considered state-of-the-art today. However, these time scales are miniscule in comparison to physiological time scales relevant to molecular machine activity, drug action, and elongation cycles for protein synthesis, RNA synthesis, and DNA synthesis (seconds to days). While an exascale supercomputer has simulated an entire virus for nanoseconds, this supercomputer would need to be 10 billion times faster to simulate that virus for 3 hours of physiological time, demonstrating the insatiable need for computing power. With growing interest in computational drug design from the pharmaceutical sector, the biological sciences are positioned to be an industry driver in computing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X24001167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molecular simulations of biological systems tend to be significantly more compute-intensive than those in materials science and astrophysics, due to important contributions of long-range electrostatic forces and large numbers of time steps (>1E9) required. Simulations of biomolecular complexes of microseconds to milliseconds are considered state-of-the-art today. However, these time scales are miniscule in comparison to physiological time scales relevant to molecular machine activity, drug action, and elongation cycles for protein synthesis, RNA synthesis, and DNA synthesis (seconds to days). While an exascale supercomputer has simulated an entire virus for nanoseconds, this supercomputer would need to be 10 billion times faster to simulate that virus for 3 hours of physiological time, demonstrating the insatiable need for computing power. With growing interest in computational drug design from the pharmaceutical sector, the biological sciences are positioned to be an industry driver in computing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物科学中的超级计算:迈向 Zettascale 和 Yottascale 模拟。
生物系统的分子模拟往往比材料科学和天体物理学的分子模拟计算密集得多,这是因为长程静电力的重要贡献和所需的大量时间步长(>1E9)。微秒到毫秒级的生物分子复合物模拟被认为是当今最先进的模拟。然而,与分子机器活动、药物作用以及蛋白质合成、RNA 合成和 DNA 合成的延长周期(秒到天)相关的生理时间尺度相比,这些时间尺度微不足道。虽然一台超大规模超级计算机已经模拟了纳秒级的整个病毒,但要模拟该病毒 3 小时的生理时间,这台超级计算机的速度还需要快 100 亿倍,这表明了对计算能力的无限需求。随着制药行业对计算药物设计的兴趣与日俱增,生物科学将成为计算行业的驱动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in structural biology
Current opinion in structural biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
179
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed. In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner: 1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form. 2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications. [...] The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. -Folding and Binding- Nucleic acids and their protein complexes- Macromolecular Machines- Theory and Simulation- Sequences and Topology- New constructs and expression of proteins- Membranes- Engineering and Design- Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation- Biophysical and molecular biological methods- Multi-protein assemblies in signalling- Catalysis and Regulation
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of contents Protein data bank: From two epidemics to the global pandemic to mRNA vaccines and Paxlovid Characterizing heterogeneity in amyloid formation processes Biochemistry and genetics are coming together to improve our understanding of genotype to phenotype relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1