Andreas Bjerregaard , Peter Mørch Groth , Søren Hauberg , Anders Krogh , Wouter Boomsma
{"title":"Foundation models of protein sequences: A brief overview","authors":"Andreas Bjerregaard , Peter Mørch Groth , Søren Hauberg , Anders Krogh , Wouter Boomsma","doi":"10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protein sequence models have evolved from simple statistics of aligned families to versatile foundation models of evolutionary scale. Enabled by self-supervised learning and an abundance of protein sequence data, such foundation models now play a central role in protein science. They facilitate rich representations, powerful generative design, and fine-tuning across diverse domains. In this review, we trace modeling developments and categorize them into methodological trends over the modalities they describe and the contexts they condition upon. Following a brief historical overview, we focus our attention on the most recent trends and outline future perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10887,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in structural biology","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 103004"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in structural biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X25000223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Protein sequence models have evolved from simple statistics of aligned families to versatile foundation models of evolutionary scale. Enabled by self-supervised learning and an abundance of protein sequence data, such foundation models now play a central role in protein science. They facilitate rich representations, powerful generative design, and fine-tuning across diverse domains. In this review, we trace modeling developments and categorize them into methodological trends over the modalities they describe and the contexts they condition upon. Following a brief historical overview, we focus our attention on the most recent trends and outline future perspectives.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Structural Biology (COSB) aims to stimulate scientifically grounded, interdisciplinary, multi-scale debate and exchange of ideas. It contains polished, concise and timely reviews and opinions, with particular emphasis on those articles published in the past two years. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion of the topics discussed.
In COSB, we help the reader by providing in a systematic manner:
1. The views of experts on current advances in their field in a clear and readable form.
2. Evaluations of the most interesting papers, annotated by experts, from the great wealth of original publications.
[...]
The subject of Structural Biology is divided into twelve themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year. Each issue contains two sections, and the amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance.
-Folding and Binding-
Nucleic acids and their protein complexes-
Macromolecular Machines-
Theory and Simulation-
Sequences and Topology-
New constructs and expression of proteins-
Membranes-
Engineering and Design-
Carbohydrate-protein interactions and glycosylation-
Biophysical and molecular biological methods-
Multi-protein assemblies in signalling-
Catalysis and Regulation