Seen through teachers’ eyes: Neuromyths and their application in Malaysian classrooms

IF 3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100250
Muhammad Syawal Amran , Werner Sommer
{"title":"Seen through teachers’ eyes: Neuromyths and their application in Malaysian classrooms","authors":"Muhammad Syawal Amran ,&nbsp;Werner Sommer","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Misconceptions about neuroscience among teachers and their application to education may lead to ineffective teaching strategies and waste valuable resources. The main objective of this paper is to study neuroscience knowledge, beliefs in neuromyths and their application in Malaysian classrooms. An online survey was conducted among (<em>n</em> = 501) school teachers, covering 14 neurofacts, four neuromyth, and their application in education. Results show more than 75 % of teachers of all levels of experience endorsed the unfounded idea that 'Individuals learn better when they receive information in their preferred learning style and 80 % of these teachers endorsed applying the VAK idea in their teaching practice. The findings also show that neuromyth agreement was positively correlated with practice agreement (<em>r</em> = 0.181, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Interestingly, numerous studies from various countries have highlighted the prevalence of neuromyths, and Malaysia is no exception and consistent across countries, particularly regarding beliefs about learning styles. With the growing popularity of pseudoscientific practice among school teachers worldwide, many educators who are enthusiastic about possible applications of neuroscience findings in the classroom find it difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from scientific facts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949325000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misconceptions about neuroscience among teachers and their application to education may lead to ineffective teaching strategies and waste valuable resources. The main objective of this paper is to study neuroscience knowledge, beliefs in neuromyths and their application in Malaysian classrooms. An online survey was conducted among (n = 501) school teachers, covering 14 neurofacts, four neuromyth, and their application in education. Results show more than 75 % of teachers of all levels of experience endorsed the unfounded idea that 'Individuals learn better when they receive information in their preferred learning style and 80 % of these teachers endorsed applying the VAK idea in their teaching practice. The findings also show that neuromyth agreement was positively correlated with practice agreement (r = 0.181, p < 0.001). Interestingly, numerous studies from various countries have highlighted the prevalence of neuromyths, and Malaysia is no exception and consistent across countries, particularly regarding beliefs about learning styles. With the growing popularity of pseudoscientific practice among school teachers worldwide, many educators who are enthusiastic about possible applications of neuroscience findings in the classroom find it difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from scientific facts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从教师的角度看:神经神话及其在马来西亚课堂上的应用
教师对神经科学及其在教育中的应用的误解可能导致教学策略无效,浪费宝贵的资源。本文的主要目的是研究神经科学知识,对神经神话的信仰及其在马来西亚课堂上的应用。对501名学校教师进行了网络调查,调查内容包括14个神经事实、4个神经神话及其在教育中的应用。结果显示,超过75%的所有经验水平的教师都赞同“当个人以自己喜欢的学习方式接受信息时,他们会学得更好”这一毫无根据的观点,其中80%的教师赞同在教学实践中应用VAK理念。研究结果还表明,神经神话一致性与实践一致性正相关(r = 0.181, p <;0.001)。有趣的是,来自不同国家的许多研究都强调了神经神话的盛行,马来西亚也不例外,而且在各国之间都是一致的,特别是关于学习风格的信念。随着伪科学实践在世界各地的学校教师中越来越流行,许多热衷于将神经科学发现可能应用于课堂的教育工作者发现很难区分伪科学和科学事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Task-dependent neural effects of physical exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies Prevalence of educational myths among Ecuadorian teachers The role of resilient coping as a mediator between trait emotional intelligence and academic motivation in university students Effects of solving contextualized physics problems among men and women: A psychophysiological approach. Autonomic stress responses in oral examination simulations: Neuroscientific insights from comparing peer-led and lecturer-led approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1