{"title":"Consumer acceptance of mycelium as protein source","authors":"Arnout R.H. Fischer, Owen Hilboesen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mycelium of mushroom-forming fungi represents an underappreciated protein source that can be cultivated on agricultural rest-streams and industrially prepared substrates. Consumer food options include unprocessed fresh mycelium or products derived from purified mycelium protein. Both the use of rest streams and the association of fresh mycelia with moulds can create a tension between potentially disgusting and naturalness cues. The current paper investigates this tension in a 3 (substrate: manure, wood, glucose) by 3 (level of processing: unprocessed mycelium cake, purified mycelium protein powder, burger from mycelium protein) experimental survey (N = 449). Results show that substrate source has limited impact on disgust but a slightly greater influence on perceived naturalness. Level of processing has a significant effect on both disgust and naturalness. As expected, social value and attitude based on benefit-risk trade-off inform acceptance. While effects of disgust and naturalness on benefit-risk attitude and social value balance each other, a direct effect of disgust on acceptance remains, underscoring the pivotal role of disgust in shaping consumer acceptance. This suggests for mycelium producers there is freedom of choice of substrate as it has limited effect on consumer acceptance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 105304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002064/pdfft?md5=87d9f9a5f705a8e93137d333de1bbf71&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324002064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The mycelium of mushroom-forming fungi represents an underappreciated protein source that can be cultivated on agricultural rest-streams and industrially prepared substrates. Consumer food options include unprocessed fresh mycelium or products derived from purified mycelium protein. Both the use of rest streams and the association of fresh mycelia with moulds can create a tension between potentially disgusting and naturalness cues. The current paper investigates this tension in a 3 (substrate: manure, wood, glucose) by 3 (level of processing: unprocessed mycelium cake, purified mycelium protein powder, burger from mycelium protein) experimental survey (N = 449). Results show that substrate source has limited impact on disgust but a slightly greater influence on perceived naturalness. Level of processing has a significant effect on both disgust and naturalness. As expected, social value and attitude based on benefit-risk trade-off inform acceptance. While effects of disgust and naturalness on benefit-risk attitude and social value balance each other, a direct effect of disgust on acceptance remains, underscoring the pivotal role of disgust in shaping consumer acceptance. This suggests for mycelium producers there is freedom of choice of substrate as it has limited effect on consumer acceptance.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.