{"title":"Demystifying “absolute truths” of additive manufacturing","authors":"J.P. Oliveira , Telmo G. Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hype around additive manufacturing technologies suggests that any complex shaped structure can be fabricated regardless of the type of material used. Moreover, it is often suggested that additive manufacturing processes will certainly disrupt the supply chain logistics and that everyone will be able to print on the demand at the comfort of their home. In this viewpoint, we describe and demystify some of the common assumptions associated with these set of technologies. We also show that conventional manufacturing processes cannot be fully replaced by additive manufacturing technologies, but rather there is a need for a complementarity between well-consolidated manufacturing technologies and additive manufacturing. While some of the contents presented here are basic for specialists working in the manufacturing field, we expect that this viewpoint can aid researchers working on topics related to additive manufacturing, but with less focus on the manufacturing aspects, helping them understand the actual limitations and advantages associated to these technologies. The four key issues that are addressed in this viewpoint, and their consequences, also intend to shape and mold future entrepreneurial efforts on additive manufacturing, as well as define future impacts (environmental, logistics, commercial and disruptive) associated to additive manufacturing technologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56011,"journal":{"name":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755581724001172/pdfft?md5=eefe1e804eba614443c5c58641b89e1d&pid=1-s2.0-S1755581724001172-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755581724001172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The hype around additive manufacturing technologies suggests that any complex shaped structure can be fabricated regardless of the type of material used. Moreover, it is often suggested that additive manufacturing processes will certainly disrupt the supply chain logistics and that everyone will be able to print on the demand at the comfort of their home. In this viewpoint, we describe and demystify some of the common assumptions associated with these set of technologies. We also show that conventional manufacturing processes cannot be fully replaced by additive manufacturing technologies, but rather there is a need for a complementarity between well-consolidated manufacturing technologies and additive manufacturing. While some of the contents presented here are basic for specialists working in the manufacturing field, we expect that this viewpoint can aid researchers working on topics related to additive manufacturing, but with less focus on the manufacturing aspects, helping them understand the actual limitations and advantages associated to these technologies. The four key issues that are addressed in this viewpoint, and their consequences, also intend to shape and mold future entrepreneurial efforts on additive manufacturing, as well as define future impacts (environmental, logistics, commercial and disruptive) associated to additive manufacturing technologies.
期刊介绍:
The CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology (CIRP-JMST) publishes fundamental papers on manufacturing processes, production equipment and automation, product design, manufacturing systems and production organisations up to the level of the production networks, including all the related technical, human and economic factors. Preference is given to contributions describing research results whose feasibility has been demonstrated either in a laboratory or in the industrial praxis. Case studies and review papers on specific issues in manufacturing science and technology are equally encouraged.