The dark side of salesperson ambidexterity: How salesperson ambidexterity increases felt stress

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.08.008
Colleen E. McClure, Thomas E. DeCarlo, John D. Hansen
{"title":"The dark side of salesperson ambidexterity: How salesperson ambidexterity increases felt stress","authors":"Colleen E. McClure,&nbsp;Thomas E. DeCarlo,&nbsp;John D. Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extant research suggests that ambidextrous salespeople (i.e., those who prefer to simultaneously engage in both hunting and farming activities) outperform monodextrous salespeople (i.e., those who prefer to engage in hunting over farming, or vice versa) to meet their sales goals. However, across two field studies of business-to-business salespeople, we demonstrate that ambidextrous salespeople are generally more stressed than their monodextrous counterparts. In addition, salesperson felt stress grows significantly stronger to the extent that ambidextrous salespeople also handle non-selling service requirements while working under an outcome-based control system. Study results also reveal that felt stress mediates the ambidexterity-job satisfaction relationship, suggesting that ambidextrous salespeople are less satisfied in their sales role because of the added stress from switching between the activities required in selling to both new and current customers. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications regarding salesperson well-being while also presenting avenues for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"122 ","pages":"Pages 78-88"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001985012400138X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extant research suggests that ambidextrous salespeople (i.e., those who prefer to simultaneously engage in both hunting and farming activities) outperform monodextrous salespeople (i.e., those who prefer to engage in hunting over farming, or vice versa) to meet their sales goals. However, across two field studies of business-to-business salespeople, we demonstrate that ambidextrous salespeople are generally more stressed than their monodextrous counterparts. In addition, salesperson felt stress grows significantly stronger to the extent that ambidextrous salespeople also handle non-selling service requirements while working under an outcome-based control system. Study results also reveal that felt stress mediates the ambidexterity-job satisfaction relationship, suggesting that ambidextrous salespeople are less satisfied in their sales role because of the added stress from switching between the activities required in selling to both new and current customers. We discuss the theoretical and managerial implications regarding salesperson well-being while also presenting avenues for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
销售人员游刃有余的阴暗面:销售人员游刃有余如何增加感觉压力
现有研究表明,在实现销售目标方面,双能销售人员(即喜欢同时从事狩猎和耕作活动的人)优于单能销售人员(即喜欢从事狩猎而非耕作的人,反之亦然)。然而,在对企业对企业的销售人员进行的两项实地研究中,我们发现,双能销售人员的压力普遍大于单能销售人员。此外,在基于结果的控制系统下工作时,如果左右开弓的销售人员还要处理非销售服务要求,销售人员感受到的压力就会明显增加。研究结果还显示,感觉到的压力会调节左右双能销售人员与工作满意度之间的关系,这表明左右双能销售人员对其销售角色的满意度较低,因为在向新客户和现有客户进行销售时,他们需要在不同活动之间切换,从而增加了压力。我们讨论了有关销售人员幸福感的理论和管理意义,同时也提出了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable entrepreneurship: How do contextual factors play a role? How marketing and sales use digital tools for innovation ideation The value of congruence in social exchanges: A dyadic trust perspective on servitization The role of innovation capabilities upgradation and digitalization in value co-creation and PSS innovation performance Collaborative problemistic search capability and digital innovation: The moderating effects of IT capability and legal development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1