Predicting drug-target interactions by measuring confidence with consistent causal neighborhood interventions

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.08.009
Wenting Ye , Chen Li , Wen Zhang , Jiuyong Li , Lin Liu , Debo Cheng , Zaiwen Feng
{"title":"Predicting drug-target interactions by measuring confidence with consistent causal neighborhood interventions","authors":"Wenting Ye ,&nbsp;Chen Li ,&nbsp;Wen Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiuyong Li ,&nbsp;Lin Liu ,&nbsp;Debo Cheng ,&nbsp;Zaiwen Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting drug-target interactions (DTI) is a crucial stage in drug discovery and development. Understanding the interaction between drugs and targets is essential for pinpointing the specific relationship between drug molecules and targets, akin to solving a link prediction problem using information technology. While knowledge graph (KG) and knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods have been rapid advancements and demonstrated impressive performance in drug discovery, they often lack authenticity and accuracy in identifying DTI. This leads to increased misjudgment rates and reduced efficiency in drug development. To address these challenges, our focus lies in refining the accuracy of DTI prediction models through KGE, with a specific emphasis on causal intervention confidence measures (CI). These measures aim to assess triplet scores, enhancing the precision of the predictions. Comparative experiments conducted on three datasets and utilizing 9 KGE models reveal that our proposed confidence measure approach via causal intervention, significantly improves the accuracy of DTI link prediction compared to traditional approaches. Furthermore, our experimental analysis delves deeper into the embedding of intervention values, offering valuable insights for guiding the design and development of subsequent drug development experiments. As a result, our predicted outcomes serve as valuable guidance in the pursuit of more efficient drug development processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"231 ","pages":"Pages 15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting drug-target interactions (DTI) is a crucial stage in drug discovery and development. Understanding the interaction between drugs and targets is essential for pinpointing the specific relationship between drug molecules and targets, akin to solving a link prediction problem using information technology. While knowledge graph (KG) and knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods have been rapid advancements and demonstrated impressive performance in drug discovery, they often lack authenticity and accuracy in identifying DTI. This leads to increased misjudgment rates and reduced efficiency in drug development. To address these challenges, our focus lies in refining the accuracy of DTI prediction models through KGE, with a specific emphasis on causal intervention confidence measures (CI). These measures aim to assess triplet scores, enhancing the precision of the predictions. Comparative experiments conducted on three datasets and utilizing 9 KGE models reveal that our proposed confidence measure approach via causal intervention, significantly improves the accuracy of DTI link prediction compared to traditional approaches. Furthermore, our experimental analysis delves deeper into the embedding of intervention values, offering valuable insights for guiding the design and development of subsequent drug development experiments. As a result, our predicted outcomes serve as valuable guidance in the pursuit of more efficient drug development processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过测量一致性因果邻里干预的可信度来预测药物与目标的相互作用。
预测药物-靶点相互作用(DTI)是药物发现和开发的一个关键阶段。了解药物与靶点之间的相互作用对于精确定位药物分子与靶点之间的特定关系至关重要,这类似于利用信息技术解决链接预测问题。虽然知识图谱(KG)和知识图谱嵌入(KGE)方法在药物发现领域取得了突飞猛进的发展,并表现出令人印象深刻的性能,但它们在识别 DTI 方面往往缺乏真实性和准确性。这导致了药物开发中误判率的增加和效率的降低。为了应对这些挑战,我们的重点是通过 KGE 改进 DTI 预测模型的准确性,并特别强调因果干预置信度 (CI)。这些措施旨在评估三重分数,提高预测的准确性。在三个数据集上利用 9 个 KGE 模型进行的对比实验表明,与传统方法相比,我们通过因果干预提出的置信度方法显著提高了 DTI 链接预测的准确性。此外,我们的实验分析深入探讨了干预值的嵌入,为指导后续药物开发实验的设计和开发提供了宝贵的见解。因此,我们的预测结果可作为追求更高效药物开发过程的宝贵指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
期刊最新文献
A roadmap to cysteine specific labeling of membrane proteins for single-molecule photobleaching studies. In silico identification of Histone Deacetylase inhibitors using Streamlined Masked Transformer-based Pretrained features. Robust feature learning using contractive autoencoders for multi-omics clustering in cancer subtyping Optimizing Retinal Imaging: Evaluation of ultrasmall TiO2 nanoparticle- fluorescein conjugates for improved Fundus Fluorescein Angiography Ab-Amy 2.0: Predicting light chain amyloidogenic risk of therapeutic antibodies based on antibody language model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1