Wenting Ye , Chen Li , Wen Zhang , Jiuyong Li , Lin Liu , Debo Cheng , Zaiwen Feng
{"title":"Predicting drug-target interactions by measuring confidence with consistent causal neighborhood interventions","authors":"Wenting Ye , Chen Li , Wen Zhang , Jiuyong Li , Lin Liu , Debo Cheng , Zaiwen Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting drug-target interactions (DTI) is a crucial stage in drug discovery and development. Understanding the interaction between drugs and targets is essential for pinpointing the specific relationship between drug molecules and targets, akin to solving a link prediction problem using information technology. While knowledge graph (KG) and knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods have been rapid advancements and demonstrated impressive performance in drug discovery, they often lack authenticity and accuracy in identifying DTI. This leads to increased misjudgment rates and reduced efficiency in drug development. To address these challenges, our focus lies in refining the accuracy of DTI prediction models through KGE, with a specific emphasis on causal intervention confidence measures (CI). These measures aim to assess triplet scores, enhancing the precision of the predictions. Comparative experiments conducted on three datasets and utilizing 9 KGE models reveal that our proposed confidence measure approach via causal intervention, significantly improves the accuracy of DTI link prediction compared to traditional approaches. Furthermore, our experimental analysis delves deeper into the embedding of intervention values, offering valuable insights for guiding the design and development of subsequent drug development experiments. As a result, our predicted outcomes serve as valuable guidance in the pursuit of more efficient drug development processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"231 ","pages":"Pages 15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predicting drug-target interactions (DTI) is a crucial stage in drug discovery and development. Understanding the interaction between drugs and targets is essential for pinpointing the specific relationship between drug molecules and targets, akin to solving a link prediction problem using information technology. While knowledge graph (KG) and knowledge graph embedding (KGE) methods have been rapid advancements and demonstrated impressive performance in drug discovery, they often lack authenticity and accuracy in identifying DTI. This leads to increased misjudgment rates and reduced efficiency in drug development. To address these challenges, our focus lies in refining the accuracy of DTI prediction models through KGE, with a specific emphasis on causal intervention confidence measures (CI). These measures aim to assess triplet scores, enhancing the precision of the predictions. Comparative experiments conducted on three datasets and utilizing 9 KGE models reveal that our proposed confidence measure approach via causal intervention, significantly improves the accuracy of DTI link prediction compared to traditional approaches. Furthermore, our experimental analysis delves deeper into the embedding of intervention values, offering valuable insights for guiding the design and development of subsequent drug development experiments. As a result, our predicted outcomes serve as valuable guidance in the pursuit of more efficient drug development processes.
期刊介绍:
Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences.
Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.