How do long combination vehicles perform in real traffic? A study using Naturalistic Driving Data

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107763
Abhijeet Behera , Sogol Kharrazi , Erik Frisk
{"title":"How do long combination vehicles perform in real traffic? A study using Naturalistic Driving Data","authors":"Abhijeet Behera ,&nbsp;Sogol Kharrazi ,&nbsp;Erik Frisk","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper evaluates the performance of two different types of long combination vehicles (A-double and DuoCAT) using naturalistic driving data across four scenarios: lane changes, manoeuvring through roundabouts, turning in intersections, and negotiating tight curves. Four different performance-based standards measures are used to assess the stability and tracking performance of the vehicles: rearward amplification, high-speed transient offtracking, low-speed swept path, and high-speed steady-state offtracking. Also, the steering reversal rate metric is employed to estimate the cognitive workload of the drivers in low-speed scenarios. In the majority of the identified cases of the four scenarios, both combination types have a good performance. The A-double shows slightly better stability in high-speed lane changes, while the DuoCAT has slightly better manoeuvrability at low-speed scenarios like roundabouts and intersections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 107763"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524003087/pdfft?md5=4306161ee6c45df5a1737b2bbb396cbd&pid=1-s2.0-S0001457524003087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524003087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of two different types of long combination vehicles (A-double and DuoCAT) using naturalistic driving data across four scenarios: lane changes, manoeuvring through roundabouts, turning in intersections, and negotiating tight curves. Four different performance-based standards measures are used to assess the stability and tracking performance of the vehicles: rearward amplification, high-speed transient offtracking, low-speed swept path, and high-speed steady-state offtracking. Also, the steering reversal rate metric is employed to estimate the cognitive workload of the drivers in low-speed scenarios. In the majority of the identified cases of the four scenarios, both combination types have a good performance. The A-double shows slightly better stability in high-speed lane changes, while the DuoCAT has slightly better manoeuvrability at low-speed scenarios like roundabouts and intersections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长组合车辆在实际交通中的表现如何?利用自然驾驶数据进行的研究
本文使用自然驾驶数据对两种不同类型的长组合车辆(A-double 和 DuoCAT)在以下四种场景中的性能进行了评估:变道、通过环形交叉路口、在交叉路口转弯和通过急弯。采用四种不同的基于性能的标准测量方法来评估车辆的稳定性和跟踪性能:后向放大、高速瞬态脱轨、低速掠过路径和高速稳态脱轨。此外,还采用了转向反转率指标来估计驾驶员在低速情况下的认知工作量。在四种场景的大多数识别案例中,两种组合类型都有良好的表现。在高速变道时,A-double 的稳定性稍好,而 DuoCAT 在环岛和交叉路口等低速场景中的机动性稍好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive multi-objective framework for the estimation of crash frequency models. Conflict resolution behavior of autonomous vehicles at intersections under mixed traffic environment. Investigating the contributing factors to autonomous Vehicle-Road user Conflicts: A Data-Driven approach. Analysis of factors affecting pedestrian safety for the elderly and identification of vulnerable areas in Seoul. How does distraction affect cyclists' severe crashes? A hybrid CatBoost-SHAP and random parameters binary logit approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1