Digitalised primary care in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of minoritised ethnic communities.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-28 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0308
Farjana Islam, Sara Bailey, Gina Netto
{"title":"Digitalised primary care in the UK: a qualitative study of the experiences of minoritised ethnic communities.","authors":"Farjana Islam, Sara Bailey, Gina Netto","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Barriers to accessing and using primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities have been extensively evidenced in the UK. However, the impact of the rapid digitalisation of these services on these communities remains under-researched.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the impact of digitalisation on access to and use of primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Underpinned by a critical realist intersectional approach, and employing qualitative research methods, this study explores minoritised ethnic individuals' experiences of digital primary care in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, 100 minoritised ethnic adults who identify as Black African, Black Caribbean, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, and of mixed or multiple ethnic heritage in four sites in the UK were purposively recruited and interviewed. Interviews were thematically analysed to increase understanding of how individuals' ethnicity intersects with other characteristics (for example, language, age, gender, socioeconomic status) to identify constraints and enablements to accessing health care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minoritised ethnic individuals' access to digital primary care is impeded by factors such as digital precarity (for example, inadequate devices, internet connectivity, and digital literacy skills), a lack of language support, and staff shortcomings in responding to ethnically diverse populations. Intergenerational support and bespoke offerings by general practices in some areas enable some individuals to overcome some of the constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rapid digitalisation of primary care services is replicating and potentially exacerbating barriers to using these services among minoritised ethnic communities, a finding that merits urgent attention by practitioners and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e823-e831"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Barriers to accessing and using primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities have been extensively evidenced in the UK. However, the impact of the rapid digitalisation of these services on these communities remains under-researched.

Aim: To explore the impact of digitalisation on access to and use of primary care services among minoritised ethnic communities.

Design and setting: Underpinned by a critical realist intersectional approach, and employing qualitative research methods, this study explores minoritised ethnic individuals' experiences of digital primary care in the UK.

Method: In total, 100 minoritised ethnic adults who identify as Black African, Black Caribbean, Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, and of mixed or multiple ethnic heritage in four sites in the UK were purposively recruited and interviewed. Interviews were thematically analysed to increase understanding of how individuals' ethnicity intersects with other characteristics (for example, language, age, gender, socioeconomic status) to identify constraints and enablements to accessing health care.

Results: Minoritised ethnic individuals' access to digital primary care is impeded by factors such as digital precarity (for example, inadequate devices, internet connectivity, and digital literacy skills), a lack of language support, and staff shortcomings in responding to ethnically diverse populations. Intergenerational support and bespoke offerings by general practices in some areas enable some individuals to overcome some of the constraints.

Conclusion: The rapid digitalisation of primary care services is replicating and potentially exacerbating barriers to using these services among minoritised ethnic communities, a finding that merits urgent attention by practitioners and policymakers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国数字化初级保健:少数民族社区的经验。
背景 在英国,少数族裔社区在获取和使用初级医疗服务时遇到的障碍已得到广泛证实。然而,有关这些服务的快速数字化对这些社区的影响的研究仍然不足。目的 探讨数字化对英国少数民族社区获得和使用初级医疗服务的影响。设计与背景 本研究以批判现实主义交叉方法为基础,采用定性研究方法,探讨少数族裔个人对数字化初级医疗服务的体验。方法 在英国的四个地点有目的性地招募了 100 名被认定为黑非洲人、黑加勒比海人、孟加拉人、印度人、巴基斯坦人、中国人以及具有混合或多重种族血统的少数族裔成年人,并对他们进行了访谈。对访谈内容进行了专题分析,以进一步了解个人的种族特征与其他特征(如语言、年龄、性别、社会经济地位等)之间的相互关系,从而确定获得医疗保健服务的制约因素和有利条件。结果 少数族裔个人在获得数字化初级医疗保健服务时受到以下因素的阻碍:数字不稳定(如设备、互联网连接和数字扫盲技能不足)、缺乏语言支持以及工作人员在应对不同族裔人群方面存在不足。一些地区的全科医疗机构提供的代际支持和定制服务使一些人能够克服一些限制因素。结论 初级医疗服务的快速数字化正在复制并有可能加剧少数族裔社区在使用这些服务时遇到的障碍,这一发现值得从业人员和政策制定者予以紧急关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1