Exploring the effect of empathic response and its boundaries in artificial intelligence service recovery

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104065
Yuanyuan Guo , Linlin Xu , Chaoyou Wang
{"title":"Exploring the effect of empathic response and its boundaries in artificial intelligence service recovery","authors":"Yuanyuan Guo ,&nbsp;Linlin Xu ,&nbsp;Chaoyou Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to customer services, but failures inevitably occur from time to time. Empathy-based response through AI is a service recovery approach, but its effectiveness and boundary conditions remain unclear. In this study, we draw on the theory of system usage to investigate the conditions in which AI empathic responses can be an effective remedy, and explore the differences in the effectiveness of empathic responses from AI and human agents in service failures. The results of three scenario-based experiments reveal that the recovery of AI services through the use of high-empathy responses can increase users’ intentions to continue using the service. Our findings also suggest that the need for human interaction increases the impact of empathic responses on continued usage intention, and that this effect is reduced if the task is deemed urgent. We also find that the recovery effect from the empathic responses provided by both AI and human agents is similar. This article focuses on the issue of continued use when AI services fail, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of AI empathic responses in service recovery and reveal their boundary conditions. This provides insights into how to effectively use AI empathy in service recovery and provides a theoretical framework that companies can draw on when addressing AI service failures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104065"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied to customer services, but failures inevitably occur from time to time. Empathy-based response through AI is a service recovery approach, but its effectiveness and boundary conditions remain unclear. In this study, we draw on the theory of system usage to investigate the conditions in which AI empathic responses can be an effective remedy, and explore the differences in the effectiveness of empathic responses from AI and human agents in service failures. The results of three scenario-based experiments reveal that the recovery of AI services through the use of high-empathy responses can increase users’ intentions to continue using the service. Our findings also suggest that the need for human interaction increases the impact of empathic responses on continued usage intention, and that this effect is reduced if the task is deemed urgent. We also find that the recovery effect from the empathic responses provided by both AI and human agents is similar. This article focuses on the issue of continued use when AI services fail, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of AI empathic responses in service recovery and reveal their boundary conditions. This provides insights into how to effectively use AI empathy in service recovery and provides a theoretical framework that companies can draw on when addressing AI service failures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索人工智能服务恢复中移情反应的效果及其边界
人工智能(AI)越来越多地应用于客户服务,但故障不可避免地时有发生。通过人工智能进行移情响应是一种服务恢复方法,但其有效性和边界条件仍不明确。在本研究中,我们借鉴了系统使用理论,研究了人工智能移情响应可以成为有效补救措施的条件,并探讨了人工智能和人类代理在服务故障中移情响应的有效性差异。三个基于场景的实验结果表明,通过使用高移情响应来恢复人工智能服务可以提高用户继续使用服务的意愿。我们的研究结果还表明,对人际互动的需求会增加移情回应对继续使用意图的影响,如果任务被认为是紧急的,这种影响就会减弱。我们还发现,人工智能和人类代理提供的移情回应所产生的恢复效果是相似的。本文重点关注人工智能服务失败时的继续使用问题,我们展示了人工智能移情响应在服务恢复中的有效性,并揭示了其边界条件。这为如何在服务恢复中有效利用人工智能移情提供了启示,并为企业在处理人工智能服务故障时提供了一个可以借鉴的理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1