The key opinion leader introduction and pricing strategy for live streaming e-commerce platforms considering the impact of network effects

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104077
Haiyue Zhang , Ronghua Sui , Xiaoyu Zha
{"title":"The key opinion leader introduction and pricing strategy for live streaming e-commerce platforms considering the impact of network effects","authors":"Haiyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Ronghua Sui ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Live streaming e-commerce, as an emerging form of social media and platform, is developing rapidly in recent years. To realize rapid growth in user base, some live streaming e-commerce platforms are devoted to release positive cross-side network effects (CNEs) by introducing a key opinion leader (KOL). However, the KOL's strong ability in generating contents and promoting products would cannibalize the viewership and sales of small and medium-sized live-streamers (SMLs), leading to detrimental same-side network effects (SNEs) that hinder the growth of the user base. In this paper, we consider the joint influence of CNEs and SNEs to investigate the KOL introduction strategy and pricing decision of live streaming e-commerce platforms, and analyze the impacts of the KOL introduction on platforms' equilibrium decisions and user participation. Our finding indicates that network effects significantly affect pricing strategy only when platforms introduce the KOL. In this case, it could be more advantageous for platforms to subsidize SMLs with weak CNE intensity while charging the KOL with strong CNE intensity. Moreover, our paper also reveals an interesting result. Although the platforms improve (reduce) the entry fee on SMLs, the access quantities of SMLs still increase (decrease) when the KOL entries. Finally, our analysis reveals that the platforms may introduce the KOL even though its negative SNE intensity on SMLs is strong, while may not introduce when its negative SNE intensity on SMLs is weak.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104077"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924003734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Live streaming e-commerce, as an emerging form of social media and platform, is developing rapidly in recent years. To realize rapid growth in user base, some live streaming e-commerce platforms are devoted to release positive cross-side network effects (CNEs) by introducing a key opinion leader (KOL). However, the KOL's strong ability in generating contents and promoting products would cannibalize the viewership and sales of small and medium-sized live-streamers (SMLs), leading to detrimental same-side network effects (SNEs) that hinder the growth of the user base. In this paper, we consider the joint influence of CNEs and SNEs to investigate the KOL introduction strategy and pricing decision of live streaming e-commerce platforms, and analyze the impacts of the KOL introduction on platforms' equilibrium decisions and user participation. Our finding indicates that network effects significantly affect pricing strategy only when platforms introduce the KOL. In this case, it could be more advantageous for platforms to subsidize SMLs with weak CNE intensity while charging the KOL with strong CNE intensity. Moreover, our paper also reveals an interesting result. Although the platforms improve (reduce) the entry fee on SMLs, the access quantities of SMLs still increase (decrease) when the KOL entries. Finally, our analysis reveals that the platforms may introduce the KOL even though its negative SNE intensity on SMLs is strong, while may not introduce when its negative SNE intensity on SMLs is weak.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑网络效应影响的直播电商平台关键意见领袖引入和定价策略
直播电商作为一种新兴的社交媒体和平台形式,近年来发展迅速。为了实现用户群的快速增长,一些直播电商平台致力于通过引入关键意见领袖(KOL)来释放积极的交叉网络效应(CNEs)。然而,KOL 在生成内容和推广产品方面的强大能力会蚕食中小型直播平台(SML)的收视率和销售额,从而导致不利的同侧网络效应(SNE),阻碍用户群的增长。本文考虑了 CNE 和 SNE 的共同影响,研究了直播电商平台的 KOL 引入策略和定价决策,分析了 KOL 引入对平台均衡决策和用户参与的影响。研究结果表明,只有当平台引入 KOL 时,网络效应才会对定价策略产生重大影响。在这种情况下,平台对 CNE 强度较弱的 SML 进行补贴,而对 CNE 强度较高的 KOL 收费可能更有利。此外,我们的论文还揭示了一个有趣的结果。虽然平台提高(降低)了 SML 的进入费,但当 KOL 进入时,SML 的访问量仍会增加(减少)。最后,我们的分析表明,即使 KOL 对 SML 的负 SNE 强度很强,平台也可能会引入 KOL;而当 KOL 对 SML 的负 SNE 强度很弱时,平台可能不会引入 KOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1