Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: A narrative review of prediction but not association studies

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111731
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: A narrative review of prediction but not association studies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently used in recent studies on knee osteoarthritis (KOA), focusing on developing innovative MRI-based biomarkers to predict KOA outcomes. The growing volume of publications devoted to this subject highlights the need for an up-to-date review.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this narrative review, we utilized the PubMed database to identify studies examining MRI-based biomarkers for the prediction of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), focusing on those reporting relevant prediction, not association, metrics. The identified articles were subsequently categorized into three distinct outcomes: Prediction of KOA incidence (KOAi), KOA progression (KOAp) and total knee arthroplasty risk (TKAr). Within each category, results were organized by the nature of biomarker(s) used, as either quantitative, semi-quantitative or compound.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Due to the lack of predictive metrics such as the area under the ROC curve (AUC) scores, sensitivity or specificity, 27 studies were excluded. A final set of 23 studies were deemed eligible for our analysis. The mean AUC scores reported ranged from 0.67 to 0.83 for predicting KOAi, 0.54 to 0.84 for KOAp and 0.55 to 0.94 for TKAr. Excellent predictive performance (AUC&gt;0.8) was observed for the prediction of radiographic KOAi, KOAp and TKAr when using cartilage and meniscal-based measures, osteophyte scores and infrapatellar fat pad texture, and bone marrow lesions, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results showed that numerous studies highlighted the importance of MRI-based biomarkers as promising predictors of the three key outcomes. In addition, this narrative review also emphasized the necessity for KOA prediction studies to include adequate reporting of predictive metrics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004479/pdfft?md5=e95ff2237a5a13663321eaf369422ff2&pid=1-s2.0-S0720048X24004479-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X24004479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently used in recent studies on knee osteoarthritis (KOA), focusing on developing innovative MRI-based biomarkers to predict KOA outcomes. The growing volume of publications devoted to this subject highlights the need for an up-to-date review.

Methods

In this narrative review, we utilized the PubMed database to identify studies examining MRI-based biomarkers for the prediction of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), focusing on those reporting relevant prediction, not association, metrics. The identified articles were subsequently categorized into three distinct outcomes: Prediction of KOA incidence (KOAi), KOA progression (KOAp) and total knee arthroplasty risk (TKAr). Within each category, results were organized by the nature of biomarker(s) used, as either quantitative, semi-quantitative or compound.

Results

Due to the lack of predictive metrics such as the area under the ROC curve (AUC) scores, sensitivity or specificity, 27 studies were excluded. A final set of 23 studies were deemed eligible for our analysis. The mean AUC scores reported ranged from 0.67 to 0.83 for predicting KOAi, 0.54 to 0.84 for KOAp and 0.55 to 0.94 for TKAr. Excellent predictive performance (AUC>0.8) was observed for the prediction of radiographic KOAi, KOAp and TKAr when using cartilage and meniscal-based measures, osteophyte scores and infrapatellar fat pad texture, and bone marrow lesions, respectively.

Conclusion

The results showed that numerous studies highlighted the importance of MRI-based biomarkers as promising predictors of the three key outcomes. In addition, this narrative review also emphasized the necessity for KOA prediction studies to include adequate reporting of predictive metrics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于磁共振成像的膝关节骨关节炎生物标志物:预测而非关联研究的叙述性综述
背景磁共振成像(MRI)在最近的膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)研究中被频繁使用,重点是开发基于磁共振成像的创新生物标志物来预测 KOA 的结果。方法在这篇叙事性综述中,我们利用 PubMed 数据库确定了基于 MRI 的生物标志物预测膝骨关节炎 (KOA) 的研究,重点关注那些报告相关预测而非关联指标的文章。确定的文章随后被分为三种不同的结果:KOA发病率预测(KOAi)、KOA进展预测(KOAp)和全膝关节置换风险预测(TKAr)。在每个类别中,研究结果按所用生物标记物的性质分为定量、半定量或复合。结果由于缺乏预测指标,如 ROC 曲线下面积 (AUC) 分数、灵敏度或特异性,27 项研究被排除在外。最后有 23 项研究被认为符合我们的分析条件。据报道,预测 KOAi 的平均 AUC 分数介于 0.67 到 0.83 之间,预测 KOAp 的平均 AUC 分数介于 0.54 到 0.84 之间,预测 TKAr 的平均 AUC 分数介于 0.55 到 0.94 之间。当使用基于软骨和半月板的指标、骨质增生评分和髌下脂肪垫纹理以及骨髓病变时,分别观察到对放射学 KOAi、KOAp 和 TKAr 的出色预测性能(AUC>0.8)。此外,本综述还强调了 KOA 预测研究必须充分报告预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying the reproducibility and longitudinal repeatability of radiomics features in magnetic resonance Image-Guide accelerator Imaging: A phantom study Magnetic resonance imaging-based biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis outcomes: A narrative review of prediction but not association studies Editorial Board Advancements in supervised deep learning for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: A systematic review Intra-individual comparison of epicardial adipose tissue characteristics on coronary CT angiography between photon-counting detector and energy-integrating detector CT systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1