As You Like It or As You Don’t: Shakespeare's Arden, Thomas More's Utopia, and their discontents

Elizabeth Bloch
{"title":"As You Like It or As You Don’t: Shakespeare's Arden, Thomas More's Utopia, and their discontents","authors":"Elizabeth Bloch","doi":"10.1177/01847678241260582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although As You Like It is criticised for the doubleness of its utopian vision, this article posits that the Forest of Arden challenges characters, spectators, and readers to evaluate alternative societies in the mode of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). Some characters, including More's Raphael Hythlodaeus and Shakespeare's Jaques, reject this dialectical education and refuse to apply their utopian experience to the governance of a ship of state. An alternative is embodied in Morus, More's narrator-character, and Rosalind, Shakespeare's poet-stage director. Shakespeare and More interrogate the relationship between the ideal and the real through a dialectically utopian mode of literary inquiry.","PeriodicalId":517401,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers Élisabéthains","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers Élisabéthains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01847678241260582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although As You Like It is criticised for the doubleness of its utopian vision, this article posits that the Forest of Arden challenges characters, spectators, and readers to evaluate alternative societies in the mode of Thomas More's Utopia (1516). Some characters, including More's Raphael Hythlodaeus and Shakespeare's Jaques, reject this dialectical education and refuse to apply their utopian experience to the governance of a ship of state. An alternative is embodied in Morus, More's narrator-character, and Rosalind, Shakespeare's poet-stage director. Shakespeare and More interrogate the relationship between the ideal and the real through a dialectically utopian mode of literary inquiry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随你喜欢还是随你不喜欢:莎士比亚的《雅顿》、托马斯-莫尔的《乌托邦》及其不满情绪
尽管《如你所愿》因其乌托邦愿景的双重性而备受批评,但本文认为,《亚顿森林》挑战了剧中人物、观众和读者,让他们以托马斯-莫尔的《乌托邦》(1516 年)的模式来评估替代性社会。一些角色,包括莫尔笔下的拉斐尔-希斯洛代乌斯和莎士比亚笔下的雅克,拒绝接受这种辩证教育,拒绝将他们的乌托邦经验应用于国家治理。莫尔的叙述者莫鲁斯和莎士比亚的诗人兼舞台导演罗莎琳德则体现了另一种选择。莎士比亚和莫尔通过一种辩证的乌托邦文学探究模式,对理想与现实之间的关系进行了拷问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utopian corporeality and movement in William Shakespeare's The Rape of Lucrece ‘Moving grove’: Dionysian rites of passage in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream and Macbeth The artfulness of historical playwriting in Richard III: Shakespeare and English Tacitism Editorial introduction: ‘The art itself is nature’: Shakespeare’s nature | art | politics Artifice and animality in The Tempest: Imagining Caliban
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1