Effects of Different Caloric Restriction Patterns on Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae114
Hui Zhang,Jinchao Du,Mingchen Zhang,Tingting Li,Pingping Zhang,Xiaowen Wang,Zhongguang Sun
{"title":"Effects of Different Caloric Restriction Patterns on Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.","authors":"Hui Zhang,Jinchao Du,Mingchen Zhang,Tingting Li,Pingping Zhang,Xiaowen Wang,Zhongguang Sun","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CONTEXT\r\nAll types of caloric restriction are preventive against cardiovascular risk factors, but the best restriction method and most affected factors have not been identified.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThe objective of this study was to explore the effects of different caloric restriction methods on various cardiovascular risk factors by horizontally comparing program advantages and disadvantages via network meta-analysis.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase literature databases were searched (October 2013 to October 2023).\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nEligible randomized controlled trials involving participants who underwent caloric restriction and systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level measurements were included.\r\n\r\nDATA ANALYSIS\r\nThirty-six of 13 208 records (0.27%) were included. Two researchers reviewed the articles, extracted data, and assessed article quality.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAlternate-day fasting (ADF) reduced SBP (4.88 mmHg; CI, 2.06-7.15) and DBP (5.10 mmHg; CI, 2.44-7.76). Time-restricted eating reduced SBP (2.46 mmHg; CI, 0.16-4.76) but not DBP. Continuous energy restriction (CER) significantly reduced BMI (1.11 kg/m2; CI = 0.16, 2.06) and waist circumference (3.28 cm; CI, 0.62-5.94).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis meta-analysis confirmed the preventive effect of CER and ADF on various cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, CER is more likely to reduce obesity, and ADF is more likely to reduce blood pressure (BP). Based on this meta-analysis, CER is recommended to control obesity only for people who are obese and do not have elevated BP or other abnormal indicators. Additionally, ADF for early control or prevention is recommended for patients who have abnormal BP or other cardiovascular risk factors.\r\n\r\nSYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION\r\nPROSPERO registration no. CRD42023455889.","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT All types of caloric restriction are preventive against cardiovascular risk factors, but the best restriction method and most affected factors have not been identified. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the effects of different caloric restriction methods on various cardiovascular risk factors by horizontally comparing program advantages and disadvantages via network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase literature databases were searched (October 2013 to October 2023). DATA EXTRACTION Eligible randomized controlled trials involving participants who underwent caloric restriction and systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body mass index (BMI), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level measurements were included. DATA ANALYSIS Thirty-six of 13 208 records (0.27%) were included. Two researchers reviewed the articles, extracted data, and assessed article quality. RESULTS Alternate-day fasting (ADF) reduced SBP (4.88 mmHg; CI, 2.06-7.15) and DBP (5.10 mmHg; CI, 2.44-7.76). Time-restricted eating reduced SBP (2.46 mmHg; CI, 0.16-4.76) but not DBP. Continuous energy restriction (CER) significantly reduced BMI (1.11 kg/m2; CI = 0.16, 2.06) and waist circumference (3.28 cm; CI, 0.62-5.94). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis confirmed the preventive effect of CER and ADF on various cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, CER is more likely to reduce obesity, and ADF is more likely to reduce blood pressure (BP). Based on this meta-analysis, CER is recommended to control obesity only for people who are obese and do not have elevated BP or other abnormal indicators. Additionally, ADF for early control or prevention is recommended for patients who have abnormal BP or other cardiovascular risk factors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023455889.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同热量限制模式对血压和其他心血管风险因素的影响:随机试验的系统回顾和网络元分析》。
目的本研究的目的是通过网络荟萃分析横向比较不同热量限制方法的优缺点,探讨不同热量限制方法对各种心血管风险因素的影响。资料来源检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase文献数据库(2013年10月至2023年10月)。数据提取纳入符合条件的随机对照试验,这些试验涉及接受热量限制的参与者以及收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、体重指数(BMI)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇水平的测量。结果隔日禁食(ADF)可降低 SBP(4.88 mmHg;CI,2.06-7.15)和 DBP(5.10 mmHg;CI,2.44-7.76)。限时进食可降低 SBP(2.46 mmHg;CI,0.16-4.76),但不能降低 DBP。结论这项荟萃分析证实了 CER 和 ADF 对各种心血管风险因素的预防作用。此外,CER 更有可能减少肥胖,而 ADF 更有可能降低血压(BP)。根据这项荟萃分析,建议仅对肥胖且无血压升高或其他异常指标的人群使用 CER 控制肥胖。此外,对于血压异常或有其他心血管风险因素的患者,建议使用 ADF 进行早期控制或预防。CRD42023455889。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Fiber intake and fiber intervention in depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Effects of carnosine and histidine-containing dipeptides on biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effects of intermittent fasting combined with physical exercise on cardiometabolic outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Energy and nutrient intake by people with and without sarcopenia diagnosed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of ketogenic diet on cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1