Understanding public confidence in the police within democratic and authoritarian regimes

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Public Administration and Development Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1002/pad.2072
Daniel McCarthy, Lawrence Ka‐ki Ho, Jason Kwun‐Hong Chan, Ian Brunton‐Smith
{"title":"Understanding public confidence in the police within democratic and authoritarian regimes","authors":"Daniel McCarthy, Lawrence Ka‐ki Ho, Jason Kwun‐Hong Chan, Ian Brunton‐Smith","doi":"10.1002/pad.2072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies of public confidence in the police have enabled important insights into the factors responsible for achieving public support. Empirically tested in overwhelmingly democratic nations, there remain questions about the generalizability of this work to different types of political regimes, especially authoritarian nations. Using Wave 7 of the World Values Survey (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 38,838) we assess whether predictors of police confidence operate in similar or different ways within the most democratic and authoritarian nations. Both regimes share similar underpinnings of confidence (corruption, religious identity, neighborhood trust, and government performance). Yet, key differences exist (i.e., country‐level differences measuring insecurity and instability, press freedom and corruption).","PeriodicalId":39679,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration and Development","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration and Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of public confidence in the police have enabled important insights into the factors responsible for achieving public support. Empirically tested in overwhelmingly democratic nations, there remain questions about the generalizability of this work to different types of political regimes, especially authoritarian nations. Using Wave 7 of the World Values Survey (n = 38,838) we assess whether predictors of police confidence operate in similar or different ways within the most democratic and authoritarian nations. Both regimes share similar underpinnings of confidence (corruption, religious identity, neighborhood trust, and government performance). Yet, key differences exist (i.e., country‐level differences measuring insecurity and instability, press freedom and corruption).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解民主和专制制度下公众对警察的信心
对公众对警察的信任度进行的研究使我们对获得公众支持的因素有了重要的认识。这些研究在绝大多数民主国家进行了经验测试,但对于这些研究在不同类型的政治体制,尤其是专制国家中的可推广性仍存在疑问。利用世界价值观调查第 7 次调查(n = 38,838 人),我们评估了在最民主和最专制的国家中,警察信心的预测因素是否以相似或不同的方式发挥作用。这两种制度都有类似的信心基础(腐败、宗教认同、邻里信任和政府表现)。然而,两者之间也存在关键差异(即在衡量不安全和不稳定、新闻自由和腐败方面的国家级差异)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Administration and Development
Public Administration and Development Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1949, Public Administration and Development (PAD) has been reviewing and assessing the practice of public administration at the local, regional, national and international levels where it is directed to managing development processes in low and medium income countries. It gives special attention to investigations of the management of all phases of public policy formulation and implementation which have an interest and importance beyond a particular government and state. PAD has a particular interest in the link between public administration practice and management research and provides a professional and academic forum for reporting on new experiences and experiments. PAD also publishes articles on development management research in the NGO sector. It is widely read by academics and practitioners alike, including consultants, donors and policy advisers. With its case study approach, it is also frequently used for teaching and training purposes.
期刊最新文献
Understanding public confidence in the police within democratic and authoritarian regimes Collaborative governance in disaster management and sustainable development Impact of public leadership on public service motivation and performance in complex environments The journal and the quest for epistemic justice Seventy five years of public administration teaching and learning in public Administration and development: Looking back and looking forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1