Sharing landscapes with megaherbivores: Human-elephant interactions northeast of Tarangire National Park

Q2 Environmental Science Environmental Challenges Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2024.101005
{"title":"Sharing landscapes with megaherbivores: Human-elephant interactions northeast of Tarangire National Park","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2024.101005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The rising elephant population in Tarangire National Park of northern Tanzania has led to increasing human-elephant interactions in dispersal areas to the northeast of the park. While the movement dynamics of elephants across the landscape are well documented, anthropological dimensions of human-elephant coexistence warrant more research. The present study used stratified random sampling to survey 1076 people living across twelve villages surrounding Manyara Ranch and Randilen Wildlife Management Area (WMA) about their lived experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and tolerance towards elephants. Villages between Manyara Ranch and Randilen WMA reported regular conflicts with elephants, while those to the west of the ranch did not consider elephants to be a major concern. Crop raiding was particularly frequent in Makuyuni, Lengoolwa, Mswakini Juu, Mswakini, Lemooti, and Nafco. Economic impacts of elephant crop raiding ranged from as low as $4USD per household per year in Lolkisale to approximately $812 per year in Mswakini, and accounts of property damage were most severe in Makuyuni and Naitolia. The vast majority of respondents (96 %) did not have a household member who had been injured by elephants over the preceding twelve-month period, suggesting that elephant attacks on humans were relatively infrequent on the whole. However, between 10 and 24 % of participants in Lemooti, Nafco, Mswakini, and Mswakini Juu noted injuries incurred in the past year. Different ethnic groups had statistically significant differences in their attitudes towards elephants. People with higher levels of education had more positive attitudes towards elephants, and elders had more negative attitudes than youth. Elephants disturbed the sleep of men more than women highlighting the gendered dimensions of human-wildlife interactions. Despite these visible and hidden costs of elephants, most people (72 %) across the whole study area were somewhat tolerant of elephants, except in Makuyuni, Lengoolwa, and Nafco where seasonal crop raiding was severe and tolerance for elephants was extremely low. People in those villages, as well as Mswakini Juu and Mswakini, were largely in favor of government-sanctioned culling, though 94 % of all respondents viewed elephant poaching as bad. Tolerance towards elephants was negatively correlated with livestock holdings and positively associated with total farm size. Greater attention to community perspectives is necessary for promoting human-elephant coexistence in the Tarangire ecosystem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001719/pdfft?md5=9be0d0265568f8a44d72397b76eb5510&pid=1-s2.0-S2667010024001719-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667010024001719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising elephant population in Tarangire National Park of northern Tanzania has led to increasing human-elephant interactions in dispersal areas to the northeast of the park. While the movement dynamics of elephants across the landscape are well documented, anthropological dimensions of human-elephant coexistence warrant more research. The present study used stratified random sampling to survey 1076 people living across twelve villages surrounding Manyara Ranch and Randilen Wildlife Management Area (WMA) about their lived experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and tolerance towards elephants. Villages between Manyara Ranch and Randilen WMA reported regular conflicts with elephants, while those to the west of the ranch did not consider elephants to be a major concern. Crop raiding was particularly frequent in Makuyuni, Lengoolwa, Mswakini Juu, Mswakini, Lemooti, and Nafco. Economic impacts of elephant crop raiding ranged from as low as $4USD per household per year in Lolkisale to approximately $812 per year in Mswakini, and accounts of property damage were most severe in Makuyuni and Naitolia. The vast majority of respondents (96 %) did not have a household member who had been injured by elephants over the preceding twelve-month period, suggesting that elephant attacks on humans were relatively infrequent on the whole. However, between 10 and 24 % of participants in Lemooti, Nafco, Mswakini, and Mswakini Juu noted injuries incurred in the past year. Different ethnic groups had statistically significant differences in their attitudes towards elephants. People with higher levels of education had more positive attitudes towards elephants, and elders had more negative attitudes than youth. Elephants disturbed the sleep of men more than women highlighting the gendered dimensions of human-wildlife interactions. Despite these visible and hidden costs of elephants, most people (72 %) across the whole study area were somewhat tolerant of elephants, except in Makuyuni, Lengoolwa, and Nafco where seasonal crop raiding was severe and tolerance for elephants was extremely low. People in those villages, as well as Mswakini Juu and Mswakini, were largely in favor of government-sanctioned culling, though 94 % of all respondents viewed elephant poaching as bad. Tolerance towards elephants was negatively correlated with livestock holdings and positively associated with total farm size. Greater attention to community perspectives is necessary for promoting human-elephant coexistence in the Tarangire ecosystem.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与巨型食草动物共享地貌:塔兰吉雷国家公园东北部的人象互动
坦桑尼亚北部塔兰吉雷国家公园的大象数量不断增加,导致公园东北部散布区的人象互动日益频繁。虽然大象在地形上的移动动态已被充分记录,但人象共存的人类学层面还需要更多的研究。本研究采用分层随机抽样的方法,对居住在马尼亚拉牧场和兰迪伦野生动物管理区(WMA)周围 12 个村庄的 1076 人进行了调查,了解他们的生活经历、对大象的看法、态度和容忍度。据报告,马尼亚拉牧场和兰迪伦野生动物管理区之间的村庄经常与大象发生冲突,而牧场西面的村庄则认为大象不是主要问题。在马库尤尼(Makuyuni)、伦古尔瓦(Lengoolwa)、姆斯瓦基尼朱(Mswakini Juu)、姆斯瓦基尼(Mswakini)、莱穆蒂(Lemooti)和纳夫科(Nafco),农作物被抢的情况尤为频繁。大象抢夺农作物造成的经济影响从洛尔基萨莱每户每年低至 4 美元到姆斯瓦基尼每年约 812 美元不等,财产损失在马库尤尼和奈托利亚最为严重。绝大多数受访者(96%)的家庭成员在过去 12 个月中没有被大象伤害过,这表明大象袭击人类的事件总体上相对较少。不过,莱莫提(Lemooti)、纳夫科(Nafco)、姆斯瓦基尼(Mswakini)和姆斯瓦基尼朱(Mswakini Juu)地区有 10% 到 24% 的受访者表示在过去一年中受到过伤害。据统计,不同种族群体对大象的态度存在显著差异。受教育程度越高的人对大象的态度越积极,老年人对大象的态度比年轻人更消极。大象对男性睡眠的干扰比对女性的干扰更大,这凸显了人类与野生动物互动的性别层面。尽管大象带来了这些显性和隐性的代价,但整个研究区域的大多数人(72%)对大象还是有一定的容忍度,只有马库尤尼、伦戈卢瓦和纳夫科除外,在这些地方,季节性的农作物掠夺非常严重,对大象的容忍度极低。这些村庄以及姆斯瓦基尼朱(Mswakini Juu)和姆斯瓦基尼(Mswakini)的人们大多赞成政府批准的捕杀大象行动,尽管 94% 的受访者认为偷猎大象是坏事。对大象的容忍度与牲畜拥有量呈负相关,与农场总规模呈正相关。要促进塔兰吉雷生态系统中的人象共存,就必须更多地关注社区观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Challenges
Environmental Challenges Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
249
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Long-term monitoring, predicting and connection between built-up land and urban heat island patterns based on remote sensing data Overcoming barriers to proactive plastic recycling toward a sustainable future Development of a brand value measurement model with a corporate social responsibility perspective. A comparative analysis of consumer perception of energy providers in Spain and Colombia Application of meta-heuristic hybrid models in estimating the average air temperature of Caspian sea coast of Iran Global change drives potential niche contraction and range shift of globally threatened African vulture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1