Melanoidins and (poly)phenols: an analytical paradox

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Current Opinion in Food Science Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101217
{"title":"Melanoidins and (poly)phenols: an analytical paradox","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We suggest that phenolic acid and flavonoid ((poly)phenol) contents in plant-based heat-treated foods and products are often overestimated when measuring total phenolic content (TPC) using the Folin–Ciocalteu or antioxidant assays owing to the presence of melanoidins. The Maillard reaction occurs between reducing sugars and amino acids during thermal treatment of foods and beverages, with the final steps resulting in the formation of melanoidins, brown/black-colored, nitrogen-containing, high molecular weight polymers. In addition, (poly)phenols in plant-based foods can become incorporated into melanoidins and affect their properties. Since both melanoidins and (poly)phenols exhibit some overlapping biological properties, it is difficult to determine the relative contribution of each, and so we highlight various analytical methods able to separate them. In heat-treated foods, we recommend that more specific methods are used to measure (poly)phenol contents to avoid overestimation or that the melanoidin fraction is removed before TPC measurements are made.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54291,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221479932400095X/pdfft?md5=c65e6b0b85465a73ffc9fe8cf4892df2&pid=1-s2.0-S221479932400095X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221479932400095X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We suggest that phenolic acid and flavonoid ((poly)phenol) contents in plant-based heat-treated foods and products are often overestimated when measuring total phenolic content (TPC) using the Folin–Ciocalteu or antioxidant assays owing to the presence of melanoidins. The Maillard reaction occurs between reducing sugars and amino acids during thermal treatment of foods and beverages, with the final steps resulting in the formation of melanoidins, brown/black-colored, nitrogen-containing, high molecular weight polymers. In addition, (poly)phenols in plant-based foods can become incorporated into melanoidins and affect their properties. Since both melanoidins and (poly)phenols exhibit some overlapping biological properties, it is difficult to determine the relative contribution of each, and so we highlight various analytical methods able to separate them. In heat-treated foods, we recommend that more specific methods are used to measure (poly)phenol contents to avoid overestimation or that the melanoidin fraction is removed before TPC measurements are made.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Melanoidins 和(多)酚:一个分析悖论
我们认为,在使用 Folin-Ciocalteu 或抗氧化剂检测法测量总酚含量(TPC)时,植物性热处理食品和产品中的酚酸和类黄酮((多)酚)含量往往会被高估,原因是其中存在类黑素。在食品和饮料的热处理过程中,还原糖和氨基酸之间会发生麦拉德反应,最后形成类黑褐素--棕色/黑色的含氮高分子量聚合物。此外,植物性食品中的(多)酚类物质也会与类黑色素结合并影响其特性。由于类木瓜蛋白和(多)酚的生物特性有一些重叠,因此很难确定它们各自的相对贡献,因此我们重点介绍了能够分离它们的各种分析方法。在热处理食品中,我们建议使用更具体的方法来测量(多)酚含量,以避免过高估计,或者在测量 TPC 之前先去除类黑色素部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Food Science
Current Opinion in Food Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Food Science specifically provides expert views on current advances in food science in a clear and readable format. It also evaluates the most noteworthy papers from original publications, annotated by experts. Key Features: Expert Views on Current Advances: Clear and readable insights from experts in the field regarding current advances in food science. Evaluation of Noteworthy Papers: Annotated evaluations of the most interesting papers from the extensive array of original publications. Themed Sections: The subject of food science is divided into themed sections, each reviewed once a year.
期刊最新文献
How to think about the future of food? Speculative design and design fiction applied to consumer research Editorial Board Waste to wealth: bioprocessing methods for the conversion of food byproducts into value-added products: a mini-review Melanoidins and (poly)phenols: an analytical paradox Microbial diversity and ecology of bottled water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1