A Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Social Prescribing Among Patients in the UK.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.3399/bjgp.2024.0179
Nur Hidayati Handayani,Marta Wanat,Stephanie Tierney
{"title":"A Thematic Synthesis of the Experiences of Social Prescribing Among Patients in the UK.","authors":"Nur Hidayati Handayani,Marta Wanat,Stephanie Tierney","doi":"10.3399/bjgp.2024.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSocial prescribing connects patients to resources or activities to meet their non-medical needs. In the UK, it is often implemented in primary care. In the social prescribing pathway, patients are directed to link workers to identify suitable solutions for their needs such as art workshops or welfare benefit guidance. Social prescribing marks a notable transition from traditional medical treatments to more comprehensive strategies focusing on holistic health and wellbeing strategies. Insights from patient experiences can improve the development of social prescribing to better meet their needs. This understanding can aid in improving the delivery and outcomes of social prescribing.\r\n\r\nAIM\r\nTo synthesise qualitative research on the experiences of social prescribing among patients in the UK.\r\n\r\nDESIGN AND SETTING\r\nA qualitative systematic review - using thematic synthesis for peer-reviewed papers focused on experiences of social prescribing users in the UK.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nAn exhaustive search was performed in six databases: ASSIA, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, and SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDEX via Web of Science. The CASP tool for qualitative research was used for quality assessment and PRISMA 2020 Checklist was used to ensure the report transparency.\r\n\r\nRESULT\r\nTitles and abstracts of 1,269 papers were screened. In total, 85 papers were full text-screened, and 19 studies were included in the review. Five analytical themes were developed from these papers: (a) Searching for hope in times of adversity; (b) Variability in temporal responsiveness; (c) Feeling supported and empowered by the social prescribing pathway; (d) Sustained change from a positive response; (e) Misalignment producing no response.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nPatients might experience lasting advantages from social prescribing if it aligns with their needs and expectations. Results highlighted the importance of matching social prescribing referral with patients' readiness to engage. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare professionals evaluate patient suitability prior to beginning a social prescribing referral.","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2024.0179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Social prescribing connects patients to resources or activities to meet their non-medical needs. In the UK, it is often implemented in primary care. In the social prescribing pathway, patients are directed to link workers to identify suitable solutions for their needs such as art workshops or welfare benefit guidance. Social prescribing marks a notable transition from traditional medical treatments to more comprehensive strategies focusing on holistic health and wellbeing strategies. Insights from patient experiences can improve the development of social prescribing to better meet their needs. This understanding can aid in improving the delivery and outcomes of social prescribing. AIM To synthesise qualitative research on the experiences of social prescribing among patients in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING A qualitative systematic review - using thematic synthesis for peer-reviewed papers focused on experiences of social prescribing users in the UK. METHOD An exhaustive search was performed in six databases: ASSIA, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, and SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDEX via Web of Science. The CASP tool for qualitative research was used for quality assessment and PRISMA 2020 Checklist was used to ensure the report transparency. RESULT Titles and abstracts of 1,269 papers were screened. In total, 85 papers were full text-screened, and 19 studies were included in the review. Five analytical themes were developed from these papers: (a) Searching for hope in times of adversity; (b) Variability in temporal responsiveness; (c) Feeling supported and empowered by the social prescribing pathway; (d) Sustained change from a positive response; (e) Misalignment producing no response. CONCLUSION Patients might experience lasting advantages from social prescribing if it aligns with their needs and expectations. Results highlighted the importance of matching social prescribing referral with patients' readiness to engage. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare professionals evaluate patient suitability prior to beginning a social prescribing referral.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国患者社会处方体验专题综述》。
背景社会处方将病人与资源或活动联系起来,以满足他们的非医疗需求。在英国,它通常在初级保健中实施。在社会处方途径中,病人会被引导到联系工作者那里,以确定满足其需求的合适解决方案,如艺术工作坊或福利指导。社会处方标志着从传统的医学治疗向更全面的战略过渡,侧重于整体健康和幸福战略。从病人的经历中汲取灵感可以改善社会处方的发展,从而更好地满足他们的需求。设计和设置定性系统综述--采用主题综合法对同行评审的论文进行综述,重点关注英国社会处方用户的经验。方法在六个数据库中进行了详尽的检索:通过 Web of Science 在 ASSIA、CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PSYCINFO 和 SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDEX 六个数据库中进行了详尽的检索。采用 CASP 定性研究工具进行质量评估,并使用 PRISMA 2020 检查表确保报告的透明度。共对 85 篇论文进行了全文筛选,19 项研究被纳入综述。从这些论文中提出了五个分析主题:(a) 在逆境中寻找希望;(b) 时间响应的可变性;(c) 感觉到社会处方途径的支持和赋权;(d) 积极响应带来的持续变化;(e) 失调导致无响应。结果强调了社会处方转介与患者参与意愿相匹配的重要性。因此,建议医疗保健专业人员在开始社会处方转介之前评估患者是否适合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Supporting patients to use online services in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Future Health Today: A pragmatic cluster randomised trial of quality improvement activities in general practice for patients at risk of undiagnosed cancer. Lived experiences of end-of-life care at home in the UK: a scoping review of qualitative research. What helps or hinders the communication of poor prognosis between secondary and primary care? A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Relationship between research activity and the performance of English general practices: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1