Public service media and public service internet as a counterweight to media concentration

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION European Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1177/02673231241270972
Barbara Thomass
{"title":"Public service media and public service internet as a counterweight to media concentration","authors":"Barbara Thomass","doi":"10.1177/02673231241270972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will discuss the question of whether and to what extent private ownership of media is the appropriate form for organising the infrastructures of social communication, or whether media oriented towards the common good and not profit-driven are better suited to the requirements of democratic communication in a pluralistic society. Starting from the dual character of media as merit goods and commodities, the connection between media concentration and democracy will be discussed based on concentration theories. In view of the fears that this connection might lead to negative excesses, media policy has long been attempting to curb media concentration. These efforts are shortly presented and discussed. Possibilities of balancing the dual character of the media within the framework of different ownership structures lead to the idea that public service media can form a counterweight to media concentration. This is as well an option for an internet oriented towards the common good. The suggestion of a Public Service Media and Public Service Manifesto that was published in 2021 and supported by more than 1000 subscribers from the academic and media community worldwide illustrates this possibility.","PeriodicalId":47765,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241270972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will discuss the question of whether and to what extent private ownership of media is the appropriate form for organising the infrastructures of social communication, or whether media oriented towards the common good and not profit-driven are better suited to the requirements of democratic communication in a pluralistic society. Starting from the dual character of media as merit goods and commodities, the connection between media concentration and democracy will be discussed based on concentration theories. In view of the fears that this connection might lead to negative excesses, media policy has long been attempting to curb media concentration. These efforts are shortly presented and discussed. Possibilities of balancing the dual character of the media within the framework of different ownership structures lead to the idea that public service media can form a counterweight to media concentration. This is as well an option for an internet oriented towards the common good. The suggestion of a Public Service Media and Public Service Manifesto that was published in 2021 and supported by more than 1000 subscribers from the academic and media community worldwide illustrates this possibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共服务媒体和公共服务互联网作为媒体集中的制衡力量
本文将讨论这样一个问题:媒体的私有制是否以及在多大程度上是组织社会传播基础设施的适当形式,还是以共同利益为导向、不以盈利为目的的媒体更适合多元化社会中的民主传播要求。从媒体作为公益物和商品的双重特性出发,我们将以集中理论为基础,讨论媒体集中与民主之间的联系。鉴于人们担心这种联系可能导致负面的过度发展,媒体政策长期以来一直试图遏制媒体集中。下文将对这些努力进行介绍和讨论。在不同所有权结构的框架内平衡媒体双重特性的可能性导致了这样一种想法,即公共服务媒体可以成为媒体集中的制衡力量。这也是以共同利益为导向的互联网的一种选择。2021 年发表的《公共服务媒体和公共服务宣言》得到了全世界学术界和媒体界 1000 多名订户的支持,该宣言的建议说明了这种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Communication is interested in communication research and theory in all its diversity, and seeks to reflect and encourage the variety of intellectual traditions in the field and to promote dialogue between them. The Journal reflects the international character of communication scholarship and is addressed to a global scholarly community. Rigorously peer-reviewed, it publishes the best of research on communications and media, either by European scholars or of particular interest to them.
期刊最新文献
Public service media and public service internet as a counterweight to media concentration Book notes: Television Production in Transition: Independence, Scale, Sustainability and the Digital Challenge by Gillian Doyle, Richard Paterson and Kenny Barr Book notes: The Digital Lives of Black Women in Britain by Francesca Sobande Populist alone, but harmless together? Analysing inter- and transnational populism of EP parties ID and ECR on Facebook Book notes: Digital and Social Media Regulation: A Comparative Perspective of the US and Europe by Sorin Adam Matei, Franck Rebillard and Fabrice Rochelandet (Editors)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1