Embrace or leave social media? On the viability of public service media organizations' strategies facing platform power.

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION European Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1177/02673231241290097
Hallvard Moe
{"title":"Embrace or leave social media? On the viability of public service media organizations' strategies facing platform power.","authors":"Hallvard Moe","doi":"10.1177/02673231241290097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article addresses the question of whether a withdrawal from social media platforms represents a viable strategy in the ongoing relational power negotiations between public service media and platforms, and if so, under what conditions. Recent diverging strategic efforts from public service broadcasters in two European countries - Germany and Norway - serve as illustrations of how existing organizations attempt to manoeuvre the current online realm dominated by platforms. I discuss findings from qualitative studies of news use in Norway and draw on comparative survey data on news use. I propose that high levels of trust in public service media, and widespread use of the public service broadcaster's own sites and offers, are key prerequisites to consider when assessing the viability of a withdrawal from third-party platforms in different countries. By zooming in on one type of media organization (public service broadcasters), and looking at different such organizations' characteristics and context, and the dynamics of their relations to online platforms, the paper contributes to our understanding of platform power.</p>","PeriodicalId":47765,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Communication","volume":"39 6","pages":"595-607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241290097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether a withdrawal from social media platforms represents a viable strategy in the ongoing relational power negotiations between public service media and platforms, and if so, under what conditions. Recent diverging strategic efforts from public service broadcasters in two European countries - Germany and Norway - serve as illustrations of how existing organizations attempt to manoeuvre the current online realm dominated by platforms. I discuss findings from qualitative studies of news use in Norway and draw on comparative survey data on news use. I propose that high levels of trust in public service media, and widespread use of the public service broadcaster's own sites and offers, are key prerequisites to consider when assessing the viability of a withdrawal from third-party platforms in different countries. By zooming in on one type of media organization (public service broadcasters), and looking at different such organizations' characteristics and context, and the dynamics of their relations to online platforms, the paper contributes to our understanding of platform power.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥抱还是离开社交媒体?论平台力量下公共服务媒体机构战略的可行性。
本文讨论的问题是,在公共服务媒体和平台之间正在进行的关系权力谈判中,退出社交媒体平台是否代表一种可行的策略,如果是,在什么条件下。最近,德国和挪威这两个欧洲国家的公共服务广播公司采取了不同的战略努力,这说明了现有组织是如何试图操纵当前由平台主导的在线领域的。我讨论了挪威新闻使用的定性研究结果,并借鉴了新闻使用的比较调查数据。我建议,在评估不同国家退出第三方平台的可行性时,对公共服务媒体的高度信任以及公共服务广播公司自己的网站和节目的广泛使用是考虑的关键先决条件。通过聚焦一种类型的媒体组织(公共服务广播公司),并观察不同的此类组织的特征和背景,以及它们与在线平台的动态关系,本文有助于我们对平台权力的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Communication is interested in communication research and theory in all its diversity, and seeks to reflect and encourage the variety of intellectual traditions in the field and to promote dialogue between them. The Journal reflects the international character of communication scholarship and is addressed to a global scholarly community. Rigorously peer-reviewed, it publishes the best of research on communications and media, either by European scholars or of particular interest to them.
期刊最新文献
Embrace or leave social media? On the viability of public service media organizations' strategies facing platform power. Public service media and public service internet as a counterweight to media concentration Book notes: Television Production in Transition: Independence, Scale, Sustainability and the Digital Challenge by Gillian Doyle, Richard Paterson and Kenny Barr Book notes: The Digital Lives of Black Women in Britain by Francesca Sobande Populist alone, but harmless together? Analysing inter- and transnational populism of EP parties ID and ECR on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1