Antecedents of effectuation and causation in SMEs from emerging markets: the role of CEO temporal focus

Ekaterina Kozachenko, Galina Shirokova, Virginia Bodolica
{"title":"Antecedents of effectuation and causation in SMEs from emerging markets: the role of CEO temporal focus","authors":"Ekaterina Kozachenko, Galina Shirokova, Virginia Bodolica","doi":"10.1108/ijoa-02-2024-4253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Previous studies considered effectuation and causation as alternative decision-making strategies used by entrepreneurs to navigate uncertainty, having various individual- and firm-level antecedents. This study aims to broaden our understanding of individual-level antecedents by examining the role of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) temporal focus in decision-making processes in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Based on a multiple case study research design, the authors empirically analyse 16 Russian SMEs to uncover how the CEO temporal focus relates to the choice of effectuation/causation strategies under uncertainty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>CEOs with past orientation tend to adopt causation, future-oriented CEOs adhere to effectuation, while present-focused CEOs rely on both decision-making strategies (i.e. ambidexterity). Prior crisis-related experience is the underlying mechanism behind the relationship between CEO temporal orientation and effectuation/causation strategies. The authors formulate several propositions that may be tested in future studies in the field.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The contribution of this study consists in uncovering a new individual-level antecedent of effectuation/causation under uncertainty (i.e. CEO temporal focus) and suggesting that prior crisis experience acts as a mechanism underlying this relationship. The authors advance the strategic leadership theory by underscoring the CEO’s role in decision-making processes in SMEs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47017,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organizational Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-02-2024-4253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Previous studies considered effectuation and causation as alternative decision-making strategies used by entrepreneurs to navigate uncertainty, having various individual- and firm-level antecedents. This study aims to broaden our understanding of individual-level antecedents by examining the role of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) temporal focus in decision-making processes in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Design/methodology/approach

Based on a multiple case study research design, the authors empirically analyse 16 Russian SMEs to uncover how the CEO temporal focus relates to the choice of effectuation/causation strategies under uncertainty.

Findings

CEOs with past orientation tend to adopt causation, future-oriented CEOs adhere to effectuation, while present-focused CEOs rely on both decision-making strategies (i.e. ambidexterity). Prior crisis-related experience is the underlying mechanism behind the relationship between CEO temporal orientation and effectuation/causation strategies. The authors formulate several propositions that may be tested in future studies in the field.

Originality/value

The contribution of this study consists in uncovering a new individual-level antecedent of effectuation/causation under uncertainty (i.e. CEO temporal focus) and suggesting that prior crisis experience acts as a mechanism underlying this relationship. The authors advance the strategic leadership theory by underscoring the CEO’s role in decision-making processes in SMEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场中小型企业中效应和因果关系的前因:首席执行官时间关注的作用
目的 以前的研究认为,效应和因果关系是企业家用来驾驭不确定性的替代决策策略,具有各种个人和企业层面的前因。本研究旨在通过考察首席执行官(CEO)对时间的关注在中小型企业(SMEs)决策过程中的作用,拓宽我们对个人层面前因的理解。研究结果以过去为导向的首席执行官倾向于采用因果关系,以未来为导向的首席执行官则坚持效果策略,而以现在为导向的首席执行官则同时依赖这两种决策策略(即ambidexterity)。先前与危机相关的经历是首席执行官时间取向与效应/因果策略之间关系的内在机制。本研究的贡献在于发现了不确定性条件下效应化/诱因化的一个新的个体层面的先决条件(即首席执行官的时间焦点),并提出先前的危机经历是这种关系的内在机制。作者强调了首席执行官在中小企业决策过程中的作用,从而推进了战略领导理论的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The IJOA welcomes papers that draw on, but not exclusively: ■Organization theory ■Organization behaviour ■Organization development ■Organizational learning ■Strategic and change management ■People in organizational contexts including human resource management and human resource development ■Business and its interrelationship with society ■Ethics and morals, spirituality
期刊最新文献
Antecedents of effectuation and causation in SMEs from emerging markets: the role of CEO temporal focus Does spirituality at work promote work-to-family enrichment among Indian female employees? Unlocking work engagement: harnessing social capital, proactive personalities and POS in newcomers’ organizational socialization The university as an intellectual capital catalyst for sustainable organisations: conceptualising the nexus Green leadership and innovation: catalysts for environmental performance in Italian manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1