Diagnostic Accuracy of the Gingival Phenotype by the Transparency of the Periodontal Probe Through the Gingival Sulcus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diogo Moreira Rodrigues, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Eliane Porto Barboza, Enzo Cerullo, Caroline Montez Lima, Diogo Pereira Luz, Leandro Chambrone
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Gingival Phenotype by the Transparency of the Periodontal Probe Through the Gingival Sulcus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Diogo Moreira Rodrigues, Emilio Couso-Queiruga, Eliane Porto Barboza, Enzo Cerullo, Caroline Montez Lima, Diogo Pereira Luz, Leandro Chambrone","doi":"10.11607/prd.7278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of diagnosing thin and thick gingival phenotypes (GPs) by the transparency of the periodontal probe (TRAN) through the gingival sulcus. Eligible studies comparing TRAN to direct methods for gingival thickness (GT) measurement (reference tests) were searched in four databases (including MEDLINE and EMBASE) up to 2024. Quality assessment was carried out using QUADAS-2. A latent class meta-analysis for imperfect gold-standard model was conducted considering the multiple thresholds (TSs) and landmarks adopted by the reference tests. The 10 included studies presented a low risk of bias and low applicability concerns. The summary sensitivity (SSe) ranged from 49% (95% CI: 25.8% to 68%) with a TS of 0.8 mm to approximately 53% (TSs of 1 and 1.2 mm); the summary specificity (SSp) ranged from 60% (95% CI: 42.4% to 82.6%) with a TS of 1 mm to 68% (95% CI: 46.4% to 82.5%) with a TS of 0.8 mm. The highest SSe (67%) and SSp (76%) were found in the analysis grouping the same TS (0.8 mm) and landmark (1 mm from the gingival margin). The assessment of GP using TRAN could lead to inadequate diagnoses, especially in determining a thin phenotype. Its accuracy is highly dependent on the TSs used to differentiate between thin and thick GPs and the apicocoronal landmark where the GT was obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"255-268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.7278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of diagnosing thin and thick gingival phenotypes (GPs) by the transparency of the periodontal probe (TRAN) through the gingival sulcus. Eligible studies comparing TRAN to direct methods for gingival thickness (GT) measurement (reference tests) were searched in four databases (including MEDLINE and EMBASE) up to 2024. Quality assessment was carried out using QUADAS-2. A latent class meta-analysis for imperfect gold-standard model was conducted considering the multiple thresholds (TSs) and landmarks adopted by the reference tests. The 10 included studies presented a low risk of bias and low applicability concerns. The summary sensitivity (SSe) ranged from 49% (95% CI: 25.8% to 68%) with a TS of 0.8 mm to approximately 53% (TSs of 1 and 1.2 mm); the summary specificity (SSp) ranged from 60% (95% CI: 42.4% to 82.6%) with a TS of 1 mm to 68% (95% CI: 46.4% to 82.5%) with a TS of 0.8 mm. The highest SSe (67%) and SSp (76%) were found in the analysis grouping the same TS (0.8 mm) and landmark (1 mm from the gingival margin). The assessment of GP using TRAN could lead to inadequate diagnoses, especially in determining a thin phenotype. Its accuracy is highly dependent on the TSs used to differentiate between thin and thick GPs and the apicocoronal landmark where the GT was obtained.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙周探针穿过龈沟的透明度对牙龈表型的诊断准确性:系统回顾与元分析》。
本研究旨在探讨牙周探针(TRAN)通过龈沟通透性对薄、厚牙龈表型(GPs)诊断的准确性。到2024年,在四个数据库(包括MEDLINE和EMBASE)中检索了比较TRAN和直接测量牙龈厚度(GT)方法的符合条件的研究(参考试验)。采用QUADAS-2进行质量评价。考虑到参考检验采用的多重阈值(TSs)和标志,对不完善的金标准模型进行了潜在类别荟萃分析。纳入的10项研究呈现低偏倚风险和低适用性问题。总灵敏度(SSe)范围从TS为0.8 mm时的49% (95% CI: 25.8%至68%)到约53% (TSs为1和1.2 mm);总特异性(SSp)从TS为1 mm时的60% (95% CI: 42.4%至82.6%)到TS为0.8 mm时的68% (95% CI: 46.4%至82.5%)不等。在与TS (0.8 mm)和标志点(距龈缘1 mm)相同的分析组中,SSe(67%)和SSp(76%)最高。使用TRAN评估GP可能导致诊断不充分,特别是在确定薄表型时。其准确性高度依赖于用于区分薄gp和厚gp的TSs以及获得GT的顶冠状地标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The 'Compensatory Alveolar Socket Seal' (CASS) Treatment Concept Combining Immediately Placed Implants, Autologous Bone Grafting, and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft. A Retrospective Case Series. Association Between Interproximal Contact Loss and Peri-Implant Diseases in Non-Molar Sites. Long-Term Clinical and Esthetic Stability of Inverted Body-Shift Implants in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A 6-Year Prospective Study. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Gingival Phenotype by the Transparency of the Periodontal Probe Through the Gingival Sulcus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Bone Regeneration Following Implantoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Long-Term Radiographic Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1