Application of Different Staining Methods in the Diagnosis of Pigment-Rich Melanoma.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/jcla.25106
Zhou Chengmin, Li Jiayu, Hou Jun, Liu Yang, Yehan Zhou
{"title":"Application of Different Staining Methods in the Diagnosis of Pigment-Rich Melanoma.","authors":"Zhou Chengmin, Li Jiayu, Hou Jun, Liu Yang, Yehan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the application of different treatments in the diagnosis of melanoma with severe pigment interference, to solve the problem of pigment interference with immunohistochemical interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The pigment-rich melanomas were first depigmented with potassium permanganate using a concentration gradient (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%) and a time gradient (1, 5, 10, 15, 30 min, 6 h), and the optimal concentration and time were found. Then, 12 cases of pigment-rich melanoma tissues were collected, and the tissues were stained with diaminobenzidine (DAB), alkaline phosphatase-fast red (AP red), multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF), and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC), and ferrous sulfate, comparing different methods, positive expression of HMB45, MelanA, S100, SOX10, ki67.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, the concentration of 0.5% potassium permanganate after 15 min treatment of the pigment significantly faded, and the intensity of antibody positivity was better than other concentrations and time. Second, after depigmentation treatment, the antibody positivity rate was 41.7%-66.7% for DAB, 66.7%-91.7% for AP red, 83.3%-100% for multiplex immunofluorescence, 25%-33.3% for AEC, and 33.3% for ferrous sulfate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AP red staining and mIF are more suitable for the diagnosis of melanoma with severe pigment interference, and AP red staining is more economical and practical.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.25106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the application of different treatments in the diagnosis of melanoma with severe pigment interference, to solve the problem of pigment interference with immunohistochemical interpretation.

Methods: The pigment-rich melanomas were first depigmented with potassium permanganate using a concentration gradient (0.1%, 0.5%, 1%) and a time gradient (1, 5, 10, 15, 30 min, 6 h), and the optimal concentration and time were found. Then, 12 cases of pigment-rich melanoma tissues were collected, and the tissues were stained with diaminobenzidine (DAB), alkaline phosphatase-fast red (AP red), multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF), and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC), and ferrous sulfate, comparing different methods, positive expression of HMB45, MelanA, S100, SOX10, ki67.

Results: First, the concentration of 0.5% potassium permanganate after 15 min treatment of the pigment significantly faded, and the intensity of antibody positivity was better than other concentrations and time. Second, after depigmentation treatment, the antibody positivity rate was 41.7%-66.7% for DAB, 66.7%-91.7% for AP red, 83.3%-100% for multiplex immunofluorescence, 25%-33.3% for AEC, and 33.3% for ferrous sulfate.

Conclusion: AP red staining and mIF are more suitable for the diagnosis of melanoma with severe pigment interference, and AP red staining is more economical and practical.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同染色方法在富色素黑色素瘤诊断中的应用。
目的比较不同处理方法在色素干扰严重的黑色素瘤诊断中的应用,解决色素干扰免疫组化解读的问题:方法:首先用高锰酸钾对富含色素的黑色素瘤进行浓度梯度(0.1%、0.5%、1%)和时间梯度(1、5、10、15、30 min、6 h)脱色,找到最佳浓度和时间。然后,收集 12 例富含色素的黑色素瘤组织,分别用二氨基联苯胺(DAB)、碱性磷酸酶快红(AP 红)、多重免疫荧光(MIF)、3-氨基-9-乙基咔唑(AEC)和硫酸亚铁染色,比较不同方法下 HMB45、MelanA、S100、SOX10、ki67 的阳性表达情况:第一,浓度为0.5%的高锰酸钾处理15 min后色素明显消退,抗体阳性强度优于其他浓度和时间。其次,脱色处理后,DAB的抗体阳性率为41.7%-66.7%,AP红的抗体阳性率为66.7%-91.7%,多重免疫荧光的抗体阳性率为83.3%-100%,AEC的抗体阳性率为25%-33.3%,硫酸亚铁的抗体阳性率为33.3%:结论:AP 红染色和多重免疫荧光更适合诊断色素干扰严重的黑色素瘤,AP 红染色更经济实用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Bacterial Viability in Faecal Microbiota Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis of In Vitro Cultivation and Membrane Integrity Methods. Effects of Blood Collection Tubes on the Quantification of Catecholamines and Their O-Methylated Metabolites by Liquid Chromatography Coupled With Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Diagnostic Performance of CLEIA Versus FEIA for KL-6 Peripheral and Alveolar Concentrations in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Multicentre Study. Application of Different Staining Methods in the Diagnosis of Pigment-Rich Melanoma. Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA for Detecting Lung Cancer Mutations by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing With Insufficient Tumor Samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1