Numerical tests on dynamic response of pile-supported reclaimed embankment for high-speed railway in saturated soft ground using soil–water coupling elastoplastic FEM

Abstract

High-speed train (HST) running in the saturated soft ground induces significant vibration that may threaten the running safety and serviceability of high-speed railway (HSR). Extensive studies have been conducted on the dynamic responses of HSR, yet, the soil–water coupling and plastic behavior in the saturated soft ground are rarely considered, and thus the build-up of excess pore water pressure (EPWP) and displacement cannot be accurately calculated. In this study, 2D soil–water coupling elastoplastic FEM was employed to investigate HST induced vibration in the pile-supported embankment using FE code called DBLEAVES. Dynamic soil stress, EPWP, acceleration and displacement under different cases were numerically analyzed in detail. Numerical tests confirm that liquid phase in soft ground plays important influence on the dynamic responses that vertical acceleration and displacement will be overestimated while the horizontal acceleration and displacement as well as EPWP will be underestimated if soil–water coupling is not considered. Single-phase analysis also exaggerates the acceleration attenuation and underestimate the vibration amplification in soft ground. The existence of piles can induce significant soil arching effect in the embankment, the distributions of vertical acceleration and EPWP are partitioned sharply by the piles while vertical displacement in soft ground becomes more uniform along the depth direction within the pile reinforced area. The existence of piles also induces stronger vibration beneath the pile end so that larger EPWP is generated below the pile end than around the pile body. The main influence area due to HST vibration for pile-supported embankment is overall 20 m away from the centerline of HSR track, therefore, it is reasonable to improve the ground by properly increasing the number of pile within this area. When the number of pile is determined, increasing the length of pile or reducing the pile spacing are two effective ways to mitigate the dynamic response.