Suggested magnetic braking prescription derived from field complexity fails to reproduce the cataclysmic variable orbital period gap

IF 5.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy & Astrophysics Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1051/0004-6361/202451829
Valentina Ortúzar-Garzón, Matthias R. Schreiber, Diogo Belloni
{"title":"Suggested magnetic braking prescription derived from field complexity fails to reproduce the cataclysmic variable orbital period gap","authors":"Valentina Ortúzar-Garzón, Matthias R. Schreiber, Diogo Belloni","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202451829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context.<i/> Magnetic wind braking drives the spin-down of low-mass stars and the evolution of most interacting binary stars. A magnetic braking prescription that was claimed to reproduce both the period distribution of cataclysmic variables (CVs) and the evolution of the rotation rates of low-mass stars is based on a relation between the angular momentum loss rate and magnetic field complexity.<i>Aims.<i/> The magnetic braking model based on field complexity has been claimed to predict a detached phase that could explain the observed period gap in the period distribution of CVs but has never been tested in detailed models of CV evolution. Here we fill this gap.<i>Methods.<i/> We incorporated the suggested magnetic braking law in MESA and simulated the evolution of CVs for different initial stellar masses and initial orbital periods.<i>Results.<i/> We find that the prescription for magnetic braking based on field complexity fails to reproduce observations of CVs. The predicted secondary star radii are smaller than measured, and an extended detached phase that is required to explain the observed period gap (a dearth of non-magnetic CVs with periods between ∼2 and ∼3 hours) is not predicted.<i>Conclusions.<i/> Proposed magnetic braking prescriptions based on a relation between the angular momentum loss rate and field complexity are too weak to reproduce the bloating of donor stars in CVs derived from observations and, in contrast to previous claims, do not provide an explanation for the observed period gap. The suggested steep decrease in the angular momentum loss rate does not lead to detachment. Stronger magnetic braking prescriptions and a discontinuity at the fully convective boundary are needed to explain the evolution of close binary stars that contain compact objects. The tension between braking laws derived from the spin-down of single stars and those required to explain CVs and other close binaries containing compact objects remains.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context. Magnetic wind braking drives the spin-down of low-mass stars and the evolution of most interacting binary stars. A magnetic braking prescription that was claimed to reproduce both the period distribution of cataclysmic variables (CVs) and the evolution of the rotation rates of low-mass stars is based on a relation between the angular momentum loss rate and magnetic field complexity.Aims. The magnetic braking model based on field complexity has been claimed to predict a detached phase that could explain the observed period gap in the period distribution of CVs but has never been tested in detailed models of CV evolution. Here we fill this gap.Methods. We incorporated the suggested magnetic braking law in MESA and simulated the evolution of CVs for different initial stellar masses and initial orbital periods.Results. We find that the prescription for magnetic braking based on field complexity fails to reproduce observations of CVs. The predicted secondary star radii are smaller than measured, and an extended detached phase that is required to explain the observed period gap (a dearth of non-magnetic CVs with periods between ∼2 and ∼3 hours) is not predicted.Conclusions. Proposed magnetic braking prescriptions based on a relation between the angular momentum loss rate and field complexity are too weak to reproduce the bloating of donor stars in CVs derived from observations and, in contrast to previous claims, do not provide an explanation for the observed period gap. The suggested steep decrease in the angular momentum loss rate does not lead to detachment. Stronger magnetic braking prescriptions and a discontinuity at the fully convective boundary are needed to explain the evolution of close binary stars that contain compact objects. The tension between braking laws derived from the spin-down of single stars and those required to explain CVs and other close binaries containing compact objects remains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据磁场复杂性推导出的磁制动处方未能再现大灾变变轨周期差距
背景磁风制动驱动着低质量恒星的自旋下降和大多数相互作用双星的演化。有一种磁制动模型声称可以再现大灾变恒星(CV)的周期分布和低质量恒星自转速率的演变,它是基于角动量损失率和磁场复杂性之间的关系。基于磁场复杂性的磁制动模型被认为可以预测一个脱离阶段,从而解释所观测到的CV周期分布中的周期差距,但该模型从未在CV演化的详细模型中进行过测试。在此,我们将填补这一空白。我们在 MESA 中纳入了建议的磁制动定律,并模拟了不同初始恒星质量和初始轨道周期下的 CV 演化。我们发现,基于磁场复杂性的磁制动处方无法再现 CVs 的观测结果。预测的次生恒星半径比测量的要小,而且没有预测到解释观测到的周期差距(缺乏周期在 2 ∼ 3 小时之间的非磁性 CV)所需的延长脱离阶段。根据角动量损失率和磁场复杂性之间的关系提出的磁制动假设太弱,无法再现观测到的CV中供体恒星膨胀的现象,而且与以前的说法不同,无法解释观测到的周期差距。所建议的角动量损失率的急剧下降并不会导致脱离。要解释包含紧凑天体的近双星的演化,需要更强的磁制动规定和完全对流边界的不连续性。从单星自旋下降推导出的制动定律与解释CV和其他包含紧凑天体的近双星所需的制动定律之间的矛盾依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1