The development of the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia knowledge scale and contribution to its validation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2403726
Fatimah Hani Hassan, Brooke Hallowell
{"title":"The development of the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia knowledge scale and contribution to its validation.","authors":"Fatimah Hani Hassan, Brooke Hallowell","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2403726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA) supports the notion of personalized intervention for individuals who are affected by aphasia. However, knowledge about LPAA among speech-language therapists (SLTs), professionals who support the communication rehabilitation of people with aphasia, is unknown. SLTs with an established understanding of LPAA may be more likely to apply the approach in their practices. However, there is a lack of valid and reliable tools to measure SLTs' knowledge about LPAA. We developed and evaluated the validity and reliability of a new tool to assess SLTs' knowledge of the LPAA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An initial scale was constructed and validated by a panel of LPAA experts. The scale was revised based on the recommendations from the panel. A total of 59 SLT participants completed the revised version on the Qualtrics Online Survey Platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale achieved a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.73. The deletion of two items increased the alpha value to 0.80 and raised the total accuracy score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LPAA Knowledge Scale is a valid tool with good internal consistency to measure the knowledge of SLTs about the LPAA. This scale may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of LPAA training for SLTs, as well as a self-assessment tool for SLTs to reflect on the application of LPAA in their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2403726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Life Participation Approach to Aphasia (LPAA) supports the notion of personalized intervention for individuals who are affected by aphasia. However, knowledge about LPAA among speech-language therapists (SLTs), professionals who support the communication rehabilitation of people with aphasia, is unknown. SLTs with an established understanding of LPAA may be more likely to apply the approach in their practices. However, there is a lack of valid and reliable tools to measure SLTs' knowledge about LPAA. We developed and evaluated the validity and reliability of a new tool to assess SLTs' knowledge of the LPAA.

Materials and methods: An initial scale was constructed and validated by a panel of LPAA experts. The scale was revised based on the recommendations from the panel. A total of 59 SLT participants completed the revised version on the Qualtrics Online Survey Platform.

Results: The scale achieved a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.73. The deletion of two items increased the alpha value to 0.80 and raised the total accuracy score.

Conclusions: The LPAA Knowledge Scale is a valid tool with good internal consistency to measure the knowledge of SLTs about the LPAA. This scale may be used to evaluate the effectiveness of LPAA training for SLTs, as well as a self-assessment tool for SLTs to reflect on the application of LPAA in their practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失语症生活参与法知识量表的开发及其验证工作。
目的:"失语症患者生活参与法"(LPAA)支持为失语症患者提供个性化干预的理念。然而,语言治疗师(SLTs)--为失语症患者的交流康复提供支持的专业人员--对 LPAA 的了解尚不清楚。如果言语治疗师对 LPAA 有一定的了解,他们可能会更愿意在实践中应用这种方法。然而,目前还缺乏有效可靠的工具来衡量辅助治疗师对 LPAA 的了解程度。我们开发并评估了一种新工具的有效性和可靠性,以评估 SLTs 对 LPAA 的了解程度:由 LPAA 专家小组构建并验证了初始量表。根据专家小组的建议对量表进行了修订。共有 59 名 SLT 参与者在 Qualtrics 在线调查平台上完成了修订版:量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.73。结果:量表的 Cronbach's Alpha 值为 0.73,删除两个项目后,Alpha 值增至 0.80,并提高了准确性总分:LPAA 知识量表是一种有效的工具,具有良好的内部一致性,可用于测量辅助医务人员对 LPAA 的了解程度。该量表可用于评估 SLT 的 LPAA 培训效果,也可作为 SLT 的自我评估工具,用于反思 LPAA 在其实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities. The healthcare experience of young stroke survivors: an interpretative phenomenological study. Clinician perspectives of engaging parents in behavioural interventions: a thematic analysis in Aotearoa New Zealand. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on pulmonary function, diaphragmatic thickness, balance and exercise capacity in people after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1