Adoption of clinical pharmacist roles in primary care: Longitudinal evidence from English general practice.

Abstract

Background: Over the last decade, the number of clinical pharmacists working within multidisciplinary teams in English general practice has expanded Aim: This study examines changes in quality of prescribing after the adoption of clinical pharmacists in English general practices.

Methods: Two-way fixed effects regression was used to compare differences in prescribing indicators in general practices in England with and without pharmacists following implementation between September 2015 and December 2019 Results: Between September 2015 and December 2019, the proportion of practices employing a clinical pharmacist increased from 236/ 7,623 (3.10%) to 1,402/ 6,836 (20.51%). Clinical pharmacist implementation resulted in statistically significant reductions in total costs of medicines per 1,000 patients (-0.85% ,95% CI -1.50%, -0.21%), the total number of opioid prescriptions per 1,000 patients (- 1.06%, 95% CI -1.82%, -0.29%), and the average daily quantity (ADQs) of anxiolytics per 1,000 patients (-1.26%, 95% CI -2.40%, -0.12%). Clinical pharmacist implementation also resulted in reductions in the total number of prescriptions per 1,000 patients (-0.58%, 95% CI -1.30%, 0.13%), and the total number of antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 patients (-0.51%, 95% CI -1.30%, 0.27%) that trended towards statistical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in the share of broad-spectrum versus narrow-spectrum antibiotics (0.02%, 95% CI -0.07%, 0.11%) and the oral morphine equivalence of high-dose opioids (>120mg per 24 hours) per 1,000 patients (1.19%, 95% CI -0.46%, 2.85%).

Conclusion: Our analysis is limited by aggregate data at the practice-level but supports the hypothesis that clinical pharmacist implementation results in improvements in prescribing quality.