Augmentation with prazosin for patients with depression and a history of trauma: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1111/acps.13763
Ping Guo, Yong Xu, Liang Lv, Min Feng, Yu Fang, Shanfei Cheng, Xiaoqing Xiao, Juanjuan Huang, Wei Sheng, Shikai Wang, Huanxin Chen
{"title":"Augmentation with prazosin for patients with depression and a history of trauma: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.","authors":"Ping Guo, Yong Xu, Liang Lv, Min Feng, Yu Fang, Shanfei Cheng, Xiaoqing Xiao, Juanjuan Huang, Wei Sheng, Shikai Wang, Huanxin Chen","doi":"10.1111/acps.13763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression with a history of trauma often responds poorly to conventional antidepressants and has a poor prognosis. Prazosin, an α1-adrenoceptor blocker, has shown promise in treating post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, particularly nightmares. Its potential in treating depression with trauma history warrants investigation.</p><p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose prazosin (0.5-1 mg/day) as an augmentation strategy in patients with depression and a history of trauma. We sought to determine if prazosin could provide rapid symptom improvement and enhance overall treatment response compared to placebo in this difficult-to-treat patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study included 59 patients with first-episode or recurrent unipolar or bipolar depression. After basic antidepressant treatment, they were randomly assigned to a prazosin (0.5-1 mg/day) or placebo group for a 6-week double-blind controlled study. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) were used to evaluate efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the results of the demographic and clinical symptom assessment between the two groups (p > 0.05). The difference between the HAMD-17 and HAMA scores was statistically significant after 3 days of treatment (p < 0.05). The difference in response rate between the two groups was statistically significant after week 4 of treatment (end of week 4, 56.7% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.011; end of week 6, 80.0% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.011). The incidence of adverse reactions in the prazosin and placebo groups was 20.0% and 24.1%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05); however, the prazosin group had a lower incidence of sleeplessness or nightmares (3.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.039) but a higher incidence of orthostatic hypotension (16.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). The severity of orthostatic hypotension was mild to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose prazosin can effectively improve the emotional symptoms of patients with depression and a history of trauma, and the common adverse reaction is mild-to-moderate orthostatic hypotension.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2200063642.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Depression with a history of trauma often responds poorly to conventional antidepressants and has a poor prognosis. Prazosin, an α1-adrenoceptor blocker, has shown promise in treating post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, particularly nightmares. Its potential in treating depression with trauma history warrants investigation.

Aims of the study: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose prazosin (0.5-1 mg/day) as an augmentation strategy in patients with depression and a history of trauma. We sought to determine if prazosin could provide rapid symptom improvement and enhance overall treatment response compared to placebo in this difficult-to-treat patient population.

Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study included 59 patients with first-episode or recurrent unipolar or bipolar depression. After basic antidepressant treatment, they were randomly assigned to a prazosin (0.5-1 mg/day) or placebo group for a 6-week double-blind controlled study. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) were used to evaluate efficacy.

Results: There were no significant differences in the results of the demographic and clinical symptom assessment between the two groups (p > 0.05). The difference between the HAMD-17 and HAMA scores was statistically significant after 3 days of treatment (p < 0.05). The difference in response rate between the two groups was statistically significant after week 4 of treatment (end of week 4, 56.7% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.011; end of week 6, 80.0% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.011). The incidence of adverse reactions in the prazosin and placebo groups was 20.0% and 24.1%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05); however, the prazosin group had a lower incidence of sleeplessness or nightmares (3.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.039) but a higher incidence of orthostatic hypotension (16.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). The severity of orthostatic hypotension was mild to moderate.

Conclusion: Low-dose prazosin can effectively improve the emotional symptoms of patients with depression and a history of trauma, and the common adverse reaction is mild-to-moderate orthostatic hypotension.

Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2200063642.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哌唑嗪对有创伤史的抑郁症患者的辅助治疗:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
简介有创伤史的抑郁症患者对传统抗抑郁药的反应通常很差,预后也很差。哌唑嗪是一种α1-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂,在治疗创伤后应激障碍症状(尤其是噩梦)方面显示出良好的前景。它在治疗有创伤史的抑郁症方面的潜力值得研究:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究旨在调查小剂量哌唑嗪(0.5-1 毫克/天)作为抑郁症和创伤史患者的增强策略的疗效和耐受性。我们试图确定,与安慰剂相比,哌唑嗪能否在这一难以治疗的患者群体中迅速改善症状并提高总体治疗反应:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究纳入了59名首次发病或复发的单相或双相抑郁症患者。经过基本抗抑郁治疗后,他们被随机分配到哌唑嗪(0.5-1毫克/天)或安慰剂组,进行为期6周的双盲对照研究。研究采用蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)来评估疗效:结果:两组患者的人口统计学和临床症状评估结果无明显差异(P>0.05)。治疗3天后,HAMD-17和HAMA评分之间的差异有统计学意义(P 0.05);然而,哌唑嗪组失眠或噩梦的发生率较低(3.3% vs. 20.7%,P = 0.039),但直立性低血压的发生率较高(16.7% vs. 0%,P = 0.007)。正性低血压的严重程度为轻度至中度:结论:小剂量哌唑嗪能有效改善抑郁症和外伤史患者的情绪症状,常见的不良反应为轻中度正张性低血压:临床试验注册:ChiCTR2200063642。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Concerning "Glucagon-Like Peptide Agonists for Weight Management in Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Prediction of electroconvulsive therapy outcome: A network analysis approach. How to treat antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances: Is there a role for GLP-1 receptor agonists? Issue Information Variation of subclinical psychosis as a function of population density across different European settings: Findings from the multi-national EU-GEI study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1