Performance and behaviour of prebored and precast pile with floating pile tip based on A full-scale field static axial load test

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Geotechnics Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101364
{"title":"Performance and behaviour of prebored and precast pile with floating pile tip based on A full-scale field static axial load test","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the load transfer mechanism of a Prebored and Precast pile (PP pile), constructed installed in accordance with the rules applicable to the Hyper-Straight pile method (HS pile), in clay soils. While the HS pile method, developed in Japan, typically results in high bearing capacity piles in various soil types, its performance in clay soils remains understudied. Our research focuses on a unique configuration where the pile tip “floats” within a soil–cement mixing (SCM) column near the bottom of the borehole, a condition that significantly influences the system’s performance.</div><div>We conducted a full-scale axial static load test on a 500 mm diameter and 140 mm thickness straight shaft precast prestressed concrete spun pile. The pile was instrumented with vibrating wire strain gauges (VWSG) and displacement measuring devices (tell-tales), embedded 15 m deep in a 750 mm diameter SCM column (15.75 m long). The pile tip was positioned 75 cm above the bottom of the borehole, creating a floating condition within the SCM material. Both the pile and the surrounding SCM were instrumented to provide comprehensive data on the system’s behavior.</div><div>The test involved two loading–unloading cycles. The 1<sup>st</sup> Cycle reached a maximum load of 3627 kN, resulting in a 75.52 mm pile head settlement. The 2<sup>nd</sup> Cycle achieved a maximum load of 4181 kN, leading to a 118.04 mm pile head settlement. In the 1<sup>st</sup> Cycle, we observed upward movement of the SCM material around the shaft after the pile skin friction reached its maximum capacity. Stress at the pile tip exceeded the unconfined compressive strength of the SCM material, indicating potential local shear failure.</div><div>Contrary to expectations based on HS pile performance in other soil types, the ultimate bearing capacity of our pile was determined to be 2000 kN, comprising 545 kN from skin friction and 1455 kN from end bearing. This result aligns more closely with the behavior of conventional bored pile rather than the “hyper” capacity typically associated with HS pile. Consequently, we classify our pile as a “prebored and precast pile,” like systems used in China and Korea.</div><div>Our study concludes that the strength of the SCM material and the pile tip location significantly influence the pile’s bearing capacity in clay soils. These findings highlight the critical impact of soil type on the performance of piles constructed using the HS method. The observed behavior suggests that current design methods for HS pile may overestimate capacity in clay conditions, emphasizing the importance of soil-specific analysis and testing.</div><div>This research contributes to the understanding of PP pile behavior in clay soils, providing valuable insights for geotechnical engineers. It underscores the need for refined prediction models and design methods specific to these soil conditions, paving the way for more accurate and reliable foundation designs in regions with predominant clay soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224001855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the load transfer mechanism of a Prebored and Precast pile (PP pile), constructed installed in accordance with the rules applicable to the Hyper-Straight pile method (HS pile), in clay soils. While the HS pile method, developed in Japan, typically results in high bearing capacity piles in various soil types, its performance in clay soils remains understudied. Our research focuses on a unique configuration where the pile tip “floats” within a soil–cement mixing (SCM) column near the bottom of the borehole, a condition that significantly influences the system’s performance.
We conducted a full-scale axial static load test on a 500 mm diameter and 140 mm thickness straight shaft precast prestressed concrete spun pile. The pile was instrumented with vibrating wire strain gauges (VWSG) and displacement measuring devices (tell-tales), embedded 15 m deep in a 750 mm diameter SCM column (15.75 m long). The pile tip was positioned 75 cm above the bottom of the borehole, creating a floating condition within the SCM material. Both the pile and the surrounding SCM were instrumented to provide comprehensive data on the system’s behavior.
The test involved two loading–unloading cycles. The 1st Cycle reached a maximum load of 3627 kN, resulting in a 75.52 mm pile head settlement. The 2nd Cycle achieved a maximum load of 4181 kN, leading to a 118.04 mm pile head settlement. In the 1st Cycle, we observed upward movement of the SCM material around the shaft after the pile skin friction reached its maximum capacity. Stress at the pile tip exceeded the unconfined compressive strength of the SCM material, indicating potential local shear failure.
Contrary to expectations based on HS pile performance in other soil types, the ultimate bearing capacity of our pile was determined to be 2000 kN, comprising 545 kN from skin friction and 1455 kN from end bearing. This result aligns more closely with the behavior of conventional bored pile rather than the “hyper” capacity typically associated with HS pile. Consequently, we classify our pile as a “prebored and precast pile,” like systems used in China and Korea.
Our study concludes that the strength of the SCM material and the pile tip location significantly influence the pile’s bearing capacity in clay soils. These findings highlight the critical impact of soil type on the performance of piles constructed using the HS method. The observed behavior suggests that current design methods for HS pile may overestimate capacity in clay conditions, emphasizing the importance of soil-specific analysis and testing.
This research contributes to the understanding of PP pile behavior in clay soils, providing valuable insights for geotechnical engineers. It underscores the need for refined prediction models and design methods specific to these soil conditions, paving the way for more accurate and reliable foundation designs in regions with predominant clay soils.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于全尺寸现场轴向静载荷试验的带浮动桩尖的预钻孔桩和预制桩的性能和特性
本研究探讨了按照超直桩法(HS 桩)适用规则施工安装的预钻孔预制桩(PP 桩)在粘土中的荷载传递机制。虽然日本开发的 HS 桩法通常能在各种土壤类型中打出高承载力的桩,但其在粘土中的性能仍未得到充分研究。我们的研究重点是一种独特的结构,即桩尖 "漂浮 "在钻孔底部附近的土-水泥混合(SCM)柱中,这种情况会显著影响系统的性能。我们对直径 500 毫米、厚度 140 毫米的直轴预制预应力混凝土旋喷桩进行了全尺寸轴向静载试验。我们对直径为 500 毫米、厚度为 140 毫米的直轴预制混凝土旋喷桩进行了全尺寸轴向静载荷试验。旋喷桩上安装了振动钢丝应变片(VWSG)和位移测量装置(Tell-tales),并埋入直径为 750 毫米的单层混凝土柱(长 15.75 米)中 15 米深。桩尖位于钻孔底部上方 75 厘米处,在 SCM 材料中形成漂浮状态。测试包括两个加载-卸载循环。第一个循环的最大荷载为 3627 千牛,导致桩头沉降 75.52 毫米。第 2 个周期的最大荷载为 4181 千牛,导致 118.04 毫米的桩头沉降。在第 1 个周期中,我们观察到在桩表层摩擦力达到最大承载力后,轴周围的 SCM 材料向上移动。桩尖处的应力超过了 SCM 材料的无约束抗压强度,这表明可能会出现局部剪切破坏。与根据 HS 桩在其他土壤类型中的性能所做的预期相反,我们的桩的极限承载力被确定为 2000 千牛,其中 545 千牛来自桩表摩擦力,1455 千牛来自桩端承载力。这一结果更接近于传统钻孔灌注桩的行为,而不是通常与 HS 桩相关的 "超 "承载力。因此,我们将我们的桩归类为 "预钻孔和预制桩",就像中国和韩国使用的系统一样。我们的研究得出结论,单层混凝土材料的强度和桩尖位置对粘土中桩的承载力有显著影响。这些发现凸显了土壤类型对采用 HS 法施工的桩性能的重要影响。观察到的行为表明,目前的 HS 桩设计方法可能会高估在粘土条件下的承载力,这就强调了针对特定土壤进行分析和测试的重要性。这项研究有助于人们了解 PP 桩在粘土中的行为,为岩土工程师提供了宝贵的见解。它强调了针对这些土壤条件改进预测模型和设计方法的必要性,为在粘土占主导地位的地区进行更准确、更可靠的地基设计铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
期刊最新文献
Exploring liquefaction resistance in saturated and gassy sands at different state parameters Performance of the polyurethane foam injection technique for road maintenance applications Mechanical response of buried water pipes to traffic loading before and after extreme cold waves Effect of torsional shear stress on the deformation characteristics of clay under traffic load Predicting strain energy causing soil liquefaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1