Validation of an algorithm that separates gaseous micro-embolic signals and artifacts during transcranial Doppler persistent foramen ovale examinations

Rudolf W.M. Keunen , Hester Temmink , Mirjam Schipper , Geert Jan Romers , Paulien M. van Kampen , Sayonara Daal
{"title":"Validation of an algorithm that separates gaseous micro-embolic signals and artifacts during transcranial Doppler persistent foramen ovale examinations","authors":"Rudolf W.M. Keunen ,&nbsp;Hester Temmink ,&nbsp;Mirjam Schipper ,&nbsp;Geert Jan Romers ,&nbsp;Paulien M. van Kampen ,&nbsp;Sayonara Daal","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is a risk factor for young stroke. Agitated saline serum is used to deliver small gaseous emboli to the brain in transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for the detection and grading of PFO. In this study we validated a PFO algorithm that can differentiate between gaseous emboli and artifacts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The validation cohort comprised 18 patients with positive PFO examinations. The PFO algorithm uses a binary tree that separates high-intensity transients signals (HITs) into gaseous emboli or artifacts based on intensity, zero-crossing, and velocity parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort exhibited 385 macroscopic gaseous emboli meeting the &gt;3 dB criterion. An additional 137 gaseous emboli were noticed below the 3-dB intensity cutoff value. The low-intensity gaseous emboli included both macroscopic and microscopic air bubbles observed in curtains. Nearly all emboli (98 %) above the 3-dB level showed overt frequency modulation. The overall accuracy of the PFO algorithm in discriminating macroscopic gaseous emboli and artifacts was 96.4 %, with a similar percentage of sensitivity and specificity (96.4 %). The inter-observer agreement of human experts was excellent (ic-CC 0.989 and 0.953).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Macroscopic gaseous emboli and artifacts during PFO exams can be accurately discriminated by the PFO algorithm. The PFO algorithm cannot be used as a standalone system as microscopic air bubbles might escape proper identification. This knowledge will be important in the design of future PFO algorithms which should make it possible to classify the PFO grade without the interference of humans.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is a risk factor for young stroke. Agitated saline serum is used to deliver small gaseous emboli to the brain in transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for the detection and grading of PFO. In this study we validated a PFO algorithm that can differentiate between gaseous emboli and artifacts.

Methods

The validation cohort comprised 18 patients with positive PFO examinations. The PFO algorithm uses a binary tree that separates high-intensity transients signals (HITs) into gaseous emboli or artifacts based on intensity, zero-crossing, and velocity parameters.

Results

The cohort exhibited 385 macroscopic gaseous emboli meeting the >3 dB criterion. An additional 137 gaseous emboli were noticed below the 3-dB intensity cutoff value. The low-intensity gaseous emboli included both macroscopic and microscopic air bubbles observed in curtains. Nearly all emboli (98 %) above the 3-dB level showed overt frequency modulation. The overall accuracy of the PFO algorithm in discriminating macroscopic gaseous emboli and artifacts was 96.4 %, with a similar percentage of sensitivity and specificity (96.4 %). The inter-observer agreement of human experts was excellent (ic-CC 0.989 and 0.953).

Conclusions

Macroscopic gaseous emboli and artifacts during PFO exams can be accurately discriminated by the PFO algorithm. The PFO algorithm cannot be used as a standalone system as microscopic air bubbles might escape proper identification. This knowledge will be important in the design of future PFO algorithms which should make it possible to classify the PFO grade without the interference of humans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证经颅多普勒卵圆孔持续孔检查中分离气体微栓塞信号和伪影的算法
目的:持续性卵圆孔栓塞(PFO)是青少年中风的危险因素之一。在经颅多普勒超声(TCD)中,搅拌的生理盐水血清可将小的气态栓子输送到脑部,用于检测和分级 PFO。在这项研究中,我们验证了一种能区分气态栓子和伪影的 PFO 算法。PFO 算法使用二叉树,根据强度、零交叉和速度参数将高强度瞬态信号(HIT)分为气态栓子或伪影。结果队列中有 385 个宏观气态栓子符合>3 dB 标准。另有 137 个气态栓子的强度低于 3 dB 临界值。低强度气态栓塞包括在窗帘中观察到的宏观和微观气泡。几乎所有高于 3 分贝水平的栓子(98%)都显示出明显的频率调制。PFO 算法在区分宏观气态栓子和伪影方面的总体准确率为 96.4%,灵敏度和特异度(96.4%)相似。人类专家的观察者之间的一致性非常好(ic-CC 0.989 和 0.953)。结论PFO 算法可以准确区分 PFO 检查中的宏观气态栓子和伪影。PFO 算法不能作为独立系统使用,因为微小气泡可能无法被正确识别。这些知识对设计未来的 PFO 算法非常重要,它将使 PFO 等级分类不受人为干扰成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Added clinical advantage of combining ultrasound with radiograph in assessing ankle injuries: Comparison with MRI Treatment of inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with focused ultrasound and microbubbles in patients receiving chemotherapy Breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation using improved 3DUnet++ Utilization of evoked vibrational signatures under ultrasound examination as a novel method of tissue classification Protocol refinement and inter- and intra-rater reliability assessment of ultrasound-based measurements of hamstring architecture, and echo intensity, and intra-rater reliability of shear wave elastography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1