Normalization of short-chain fatty acid concentration by bacterial count of stool samples improves discrimination between eubiotic and dysbiotic gut microbiota caused by Clostridioides difficile infection.

IF 12.2 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gut Microbes Pub Date : 2024-10-12 DOI:10.1080/19490976.2024.2415488
Anna Sayol-Altarriba,Andrea Aira,Anna Villasante,Rosa Albarracín,Joana Faneca,Gregori Casals,José Luis Villanueva-Cañas,Climent Casals-Pascual
{"title":"Normalization of short-chain fatty acid concentration by bacterial count of stool samples improves discrimination between eubiotic and dysbiotic gut microbiota caused by Clostridioides difficile infection.","authors":"Anna Sayol-Altarriba,Andrea Aira,Anna Villasante,Rosa Albarracín,Joana Faneca,Gregori Casals,José Luis Villanueva-Cañas,Climent Casals-Pascual","doi":"10.1080/19490976.2024.2415488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) represent a cornerstone of gut health, serving as critical mediators of immune modulation and overall host homeostasis. Patients with dysbiosis caused by Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) typically exhibit lower SCFAs levels compared to healthy stool donors and, thus, the concentration of SCFAs has been proposed as a proxy marker of a healthy microbiota. However, there is no consistency in the methods used to quantify SCFAs in stool samples and usually, the results are normalized by the weight of the stool samples, which does not address differences in water and fiber content and ignores bacterial counts in the sample (the main component of stool that contributes to the composition of these metabolites in the sample). Here, we show that normalized SCFAs concentrations by the bacterial count improve discrimination between healthy and dysbiotic samples (patients with CDI), particularly when using acetate and propionate levels. After normalization, butyrate is the metabolite that best discriminates eubiotic and dysbiotic samples according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC-ROC = 0.860, [95% CI: 0.786-0.934], p < .0001).","PeriodicalId":12909,"journal":{"name":"Gut Microbes","volume":"33 1","pages":"2415488"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2024.2415488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) represent a cornerstone of gut health, serving as critical mediators of immune modulation and overall host homeostasis. Patients with dysbiosis caused by Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) typically exhibit lower SCFAs levels compared to healthy stool donors and, thus, the concentration of SCFAs has been proposed as a proxy marker of a healthy microbiota. However, there is no consistency in the methods used to quantify SCFAs in stool samples and usually, the results are normalized by the weight of the stool samples, which does not address differences in water and fiber content and ignores bacterial counts in the sample (the main component of stool that contributes to the composition of these metabolites in the sample). Here, we show that normalized SCFAs concentrations by the bacterial count improve discrimination between healthy and dysbiotic samples (patients with CDI), particularly when using acetate and propionate levels. After normalization, butyrate is the metabolite that best discriminates eubiotic and dysbiotic samples according to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC-ROC = 0.860, [95% CI: 0.786-0.934], p < .0001).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过粪便样本细菌计数对短链脂肪酸浓度进行归一化处理,可提高对艰难梭菌感染引起的优生和菌群失调肠道微生物群的鉴别能力。
短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)是肠道健康的基石,是免疫调节和宿主整体平衡的关键介质。与健康粪便供体相比,艰难梭菌感染(CDI)导致的菌群失调患者通常表现出较低的 SCFAs 水平,因此,SCFAs 的浓度被认为是健康微生物群的替代标志物。然而,用于量化粪便样本中 SCFAs 的方法并不一致,通常是根据粪便样本的重量对结果进行归一化处理,这并不能解决水分和纤维含量的差异问题,而且忽略了样本中的细菌数量(粪便的主要成分会影响样本中这些代谢物的组成)。在这里,我们展示了通过细菌计数对 SCFAs 浓度进行归一化可提高健康样本和菌群失调样本(CDI 患者)之间的区分度,尤其是在使用乙酸盐和丙酸盐水平时。根据接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC = 0.860,[95% CI:0.786-0.934],p < .0001),归一化后,丁酸盐是最能区分优生和菌群失调样本的代谢物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gut Microbes
Gut Microbes Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in human physiology, influencing various aspects of health and disease such as nutrition, obesity, brain function, allergic responses, immunity, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, cancer development, cardiac disease, liver disease, and more. Gut Microbes serves as a platform for showcasing and discussing state-of-the-art research related to the microorganisms present in the intestine. The journal emphasizes mechanistic and cause-and-effect studies. Additionally, it has a counterpart, Gut Microbes Reports, which places a greater focus on emerging topics and comparative and incremental studies.
期刊最新文献
Genomic island-encoded LmiA regulates acid resistance and biofilm formation in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Gut microbiota and microbial metabolites for osteoporosis. Non-stochastic reassembly of a metabolically cohesive gut consortium shaped by N-acetyl-lactosamine-enriched fibers. The regulatory effect of chitooligosaccharides on islet inflammation in T2D individuals after islet cell transplantation: the mechanism behind Candida albicans abundance and macrophage polarization. Systematically-designed mixtures outperform single fibers for gut microbiota support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1