Feasibility of an artificial intelligence system for tumor response evaluation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01460-9
Nie Xiuli, Chen Hua, Gao Peng, Yu Hairong, Sun Meili, Yan Peng
{"title":"Feasibility of an artificial intelligence system for tumor response evaluation.","authors":"Nie Xiuli, Chen Hua, Gao Peng, Yu Hairong, Sun Meili, Yan Peng","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01460-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to measure the long-diameter of tumors for evaluating treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study included 48 patients with lung-specific target lesions and conducted 277 measurements. The radiologists recorded the long-diameter in axial imaging plane of the target lesions for each measurement. Meanwhile, AI software was utilized to measure the long-diameter in both the axial imaging plane and in three dimensions (3D). Statistical analyses including the Bland-Altman plot, Spearman correlation analysis, and paired t-test to ascertain the accuracy and reliability of our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Bland-Altman plot showed that the AI measurements had a bias of -0.28 mm and had limits of agreement ranging from - 13.78 to 13.22 mm (P = 0.497), indicating agreement with the manual measurements. However, there was no agreement between the 3D measurements and the manual measurements, with P < 0.001. The paired t-test revealed no statistically significant difference between the manual measurements and AI measurements (P = 0.497), whereas a statistically significant difference was observed between the manual measurements and 3D measurements (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of AI in measuring the long-diameter of tumors had significantly improved efficiency and reduced the incidence of subjective measurement errors. This advancement facilitated more convenient and accurate tumor response evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01460-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to measure the long-diameter of tumors for evaluating treatment response.

Methods: Our study included 48 patients with lung-specific target lesions and conducted 277 measurements. The radiologists recorded the long-diameter in axial imaging plane of the target lesions for each measurement. Meanwhile, AI software was utilized to measure the long-diameter in both the axial imaging plane and in three dimensions (3D). Statistical analyses including the Bland-Altman plot, Spearman correlation analysis, and paired t-test to ascertain the accuracy and reliability of our findings.

Results: The Bland-Altman plot showed that the AI measurements had a bias of -0.28 mm and had limits of agreement ranging from - 13.78 to 13.22 mm (P = 0.497), indicating agreement with the manual measurements. However, there was no agreement between the 3D measurements and the manual measurements, with P < 0.001. The paired t-test revealed no statistically significant difference between the manual measurements and AI measurements (P = 0.497), whereas a statistically significant difference was observed between the manual measurements and 3D measurements (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The application of AI in measuring the long-diameter of tumors had significantly improved efficiency and reduced the incidence of subjective measurement errors. This advancement facilitated more convenient and accurate tumor response evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤反应评估人工智能系统的可行性。
目的:本研究旨在评估使用人工智能(AI)测量肿瘤长径以评估治疗反应的可行性:我们的研究纳入了48例肺特异性靶病变患者,进行了277次测量。放射科医生记录了每次测量的靶病灶轴向成像平面长径。同时,利用人工智能软件测量轴向成像平面和三维(3D)的长径。统计分析包括 Bland-Altman 图、Spearman 相关性分析和配对 t 检验,以确定研究结果的准确性和可靠性:布兰德-阿尔特曼图显示,人工智能测量结果的偏差为-0.28毫米,一致性范围为-13.78至13.22毫米(P=0.497),表明与人工测量结果一致。然而,三维测量结果与人工测量结果不一致,P 结论:人工智能在肿瘤长径测量中的应用大大提高了效率,减少了主观测量误差的发生。这一进步有助于更方便、更准确地评估肿瘤反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
In vitro detection of cancer cells using a novel fluorescent choline derivative. Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients. Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy. The predictive value of nomogram for adnexal cystic-solid masses based on O-RADS US, clinical and laboratory indicators. The study on ultrasound image classification using a dual-branch model based on Resnet50 guided by U-net segmentation results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1