Marcin Radom , Agnieszka Rybarczyk , Igor Piekarz , Piotr Formanowicz
{"title":"Algorithms for evaluation of minimal cut sets","authors":"Marcin Radom , Agnieszka Rybarczyk , Igor Piekarz , Piotr Formanowicz","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>We propose a way to enhance the evaluation of minimal cut sets (MCSs) in biological systems modeled by Petri nets, by providing criteria and methodology for determining their optimality in disabling specific processes without affecting critical system components.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>This study concerns Petri nets to model biological systems and utilizes two primary approaches for MCS evaluation. First is the analyzing impact on t-invariants to identify structural dependencies. Second is assessing the impact on potentially starved transitions caused by the inactivity of specific MCSs. This approach deal with net dynamics. These methodologies aim to offer practical tools for assessing the quality and effectiveness of MCSs.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The proposed methodologies were applied to two case studies. In the first case, a cholesterol metabolism network was analyzed to investigate how local inflammation and oxidative stress, in conjunction with cholesterol imbalances, influence the progression of atherosclerosis. The MCSs were ranked, with the top sets presented, focusing on those that disabled the fewest number of t-invariants. In the second case, a carbohydrate metabolism disorder model was examined to understand its impact on atherosclerosis progression. The analysis aimed to identify MCSs that could inhibit the atherosclerosis process by targeting specific transitions. Both studies utilized the Holmes software for calculations, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation methodologies in ranking MCSs for practical biological applications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The algorithms proposed in this paper offer an analytical approach for evaluating the quality of MCSs in biological systems. By providing criteria for MCS optimality, these approaches have potential to enhance the utility of MCS analysis in systems biology, aiding in the understanding and manipulation of complex biological networks.</div><div>Algorithm are implemented within Holmes software, an open-source project available at <span><span>https://github.com/bszawulak/HolmesPN</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104740"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
We propose a way to enhance the evaluation of minimal cut sets (MCSs) in biological systems modeled by Petri nets, by providing criteria and methodology for determining their optimality in disabling specific processes without affecting critical system components.
Methods:
This study concerns Petri nets to model biological systems and utilizes two primary approaches for MCS evaluation. First is the analyzing impact on t-invariants to identify structural dependencies. Second is assessing the impact on potentially starved transitions caused by the inactivity of specific MCSs. This approach deal with net dynamics. These methodologies aim to offer practical tools for assessing the quality and effectiveness of MCSs.
Results:
The proposed methodologies were applied to two case studies. In the first case, a cholesterol metabolism network was analyzed to investigate how local inflammation and oxidative stress, in conjunction with cholesterol imbalances, influence the progression of atherosclerosis. The MCSs were ranked, with the top sets presented, focusing on those that disabled the fewest number of t-invariants. In the second case, a carbohydrate metabolism disorder model was examined to understand its impact on atherosclerosis progression. The analysis aimed to identify MCSs that could inhibit the atherosclerosis process by targeting specific transitions. Both studies utilized the Holmes software for calculations, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed evaluation methodologies in ranking MCSs for practical biological applications.
Conclusion:
The algorithms proposed in this paper offer an analytical approach for evaluating the quality of MCSs in biological systems. By providing criteria for MCS optimality, these approaches have potential to enhance the utility of MCS analysis in systems biology, aiding in the understanding and manipulation of complex biological networks.
Algorithm are implemented within Holmes software, an open-source project available at https://github.com/bszawulak/HolmesPN.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.