{"title":"Observation of Food Handlers’ Hand Hygiene Behavior During Production at a Sandwich-making Factory","authors":"Abuzar I.A. Mohamed , Ellen W. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective hand hygiene is essential during food production to reduce the risk of microbiological contamination. Improper hand hygiene by food handlers can be a major contributing factor in the spread of foodborne illnesses. Self-reported behavior does not equate to actual behavior as it has the limitation of biases. Therefore, observational data are more effective at assessing the actual behavior of food handlers. Covert observation utilizing closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras can yield reliable data. This study utilized covert observation to assess hand hygiene compliance from CCTV footage of food handlers in a sandwich-making facility. An electronic observation checklist, based upon the company’s hand-hygiene protocol, was used to capture observed hand hygiene practices. A total of 588 occasions that required hand hygiene practices by food handlers (<em>n</em> = 12) were observed during the production of ready-to-eat (RTE) sandwiches over 16 h during two shifts. Food handlers did not wash their hands on 32% of occasions which required food hygiene practices. Of those occasions where there was an attempt to implement hand hygiene practices (<em>n</em> = 401), only 1% of behaviors were compliant with the company hand hygiene protocol. Observations indicated that 95% of attempts did not adhere to the recommended handwashing duration (≥20 s). Soap was not used in 4% of attempts, and hands were not wetted prior to applying soap in 16% of attempts. Additionally, 62% of attempts did not use hand sanitizer after handwashing and drying. Food handlers were observed attempting hand hygiene practices significantly more frequently (<em>p</em> < 0.001) when entering (89% of occasions) than exiting (8% of occasions) the production area. Findings indicate that appropriate interventions are needed to improve hand hygiene compliance of food handlers to ensure food is produced safely within the food manufacturing sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective hand hygiene is essential during food production to reduce the risk of microbiological contamination. Improper hand hygiene by food handlers can be a major contributing factor in the spread of foodborne illnesses. Self-reported behavior does not equate to actual behavior as it has the limitation of biases. Therefore, observational data are more effective at assessing the actual behavior of food handlers. Covert observation utilizing closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras can yield reliable data. This study utilized covert observation to assess hand hygiene compliance from CCTV footage of food handlers in a sandwich-making facility. An electronic observation checklist, based upon the company’s hand-hygiene protocol, was used to capture observed hand hygiene practices. A total of 588 occasions that required hand hygiene practices by food handlers (n = 12) were observed during the production of ready-to-eat (RTE) sandwiches over 16 h during two shifts. Food handlers did not wash their hands on 32% of occasions which required food hygiene practices. Of those occasions where there was an attempt to implement hand hygiene practices (n = 401), only 1% of behaviors were compliant with the company hand hygiene protocol. Observations indicated that 95% of attempts did not adhere to the recommended handwashing duration (≥20 s). Soap was not used in 4% of attempts, and hands were not wetted prior to applying soap in 16% of attempts. Additionally, 62% of attempts did not use hand sanitizer after handwashing and drying. Food handlers were observed attempting hand hygiene practices significantly more frequently (p < 0.001) when entering (89% of occasions) than exiting (8% of occasions) the production area. Findings indicate that appropriate interventions are needed to improve hand hygiene compliance of food handlers to ensure food is produced safely within the food manufacturing sector.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.