Routes to renewables: Overcoming obstacles and accelerating biogas cooperation

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103802
Anica Mertins , Jantje Halberstadt , Tim Wawer
{"title":"Routes to renewables: Overcoming obstacles and accelerating biogas cooperation","authors":"Anica Mertins ,&nbsp;Jantje Halberstadt ,&nbsp;Tim Wawer","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the biogas industry, there is growing interest in new business models focused on upgrading biogas to green gases, such as biomethane and biogenic hydrogen. Cooperation among various biogas plant operators by combining several plants would enable small plants to achieve the necessary amount of biogas to implement these upgrading approaches. A key aspect of cooperative business models is the interest and willingness of biogas plant operators to engage. We conduct a systematic literature review to identify the drivers and barriers influencing biogas plant operators' adoption of cooperative business models and validate it through twenty semi-structured interviews with biogas plant operators in Germany. We analyse the interviews using qualitative content analysis. Key drivers identified are synergy effects, such as the reduction of installation and operating costs or the shared use of information. Social drivers can be increasing motivation through cooperation or a greater willingness to take risks. Political framework conditions, such as financial support or simplified permitting processes, are relevant examples of positive framework conditions. The main barriers identified include scepticism and bad experiences with collaboration. Financial hurdles, such as uncertainty about revenue sharing or in relation to achievable revenues, can also represent an obstacle. The paper delivers an essential contribution by presenting actionable measures for fostering successful cooperation among biogas plant operators, tailored to each phase of collaboration based on comprehensive insights into their driving forces and impediments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103802"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the biogas industry, there is growing interest in new business models focused on upgrading biogas to green gases, such as biomethane and biogenic hydrogen. Cooperation among various biogas plant operators by combining several plants would enable small plants to achieve the necessary amount of biogas to implement these upgrading approaches. A key aspect of cooperative business models is the interest and willingness of biogas plant operators to engage. We conduct a systematic literature review to identify the drivers and barriers influencing biogas plant operators' adoption of cooperative business models and validate it through twenty semi-structured interviews with biogas plant operators in Germany. We analyse the interviews using qualitative content analysis. Key drivers identified are synergy effects, such as the reduction of installation and operating costs or the shared use of information. Social drivers can be increasing motivation through cooperation or a greater willingness to take risks. Political framework conditions, such as financial support or simplified permitting processes, are relevant examples of positive framework conditions. The main barriers identified include scepticism and bad experiences with collaboration. Financial hurdles, such as uncertainty about revenue sharing or in relation to achievable revenues, can also represent an obstacle. The paper delivers an essential contribution by presenting actionable measures for fostering successful cooperation among biogas plant operators, tailored to each phase of collaboration based on comprehensive insights into their driving forces and impediments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可再生能源之路:克服障碍,加快沼气合作
在沼气行业,人们对新商业模式的兴趣与日俱增,这种模式的重点是将沼气升级为绿色气体,如生物甲烷和生物氢。不同沼气厂经营者之间通过联合几家沼气厂进行合作,可使小型沼气厂获得必要的沼气量,以实施这些升级方法。合作商业模式的一个关键方面是沼气厂运营商的参与兴趣和意愿。我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定影响沼气厂经营者采用合作商业模式的驱动因素和障碍,并通过对德国沼气厂经营者进行二十次半结构化访谈来验证。我们采用定性内容分析法对访谈内容进行了分析。发现的主要驱动因素是协同效应,如降低安装和运营成本或共享信息。社会驱动力可以是通过合作提高积极性,或更愿意承担风险。政治框架条件,如财政支持或简化许可程序,是积极框架条件的相关实例。已确定的主要障碍包括对合作的怀疑和不良经历。财政障碍,如收入分享或可实现收入的不确定性,也可能构成障碍。本文提出了促进沼气厂运营商之间成功合作的可行措施,根据对其驱动力和障碍的全面了解,针对合作的各个阶段量身定制,从而做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends? Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ Connected, complex, and carbonized: The country archetypes of the petrochemicals sector Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany Energy subsidies versus cash transfers: the causal effect of misperceptions on public support for countermeasures during the energy crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1