Which tariff to choose? How individual attitudes and preferences explain demand for flexible electricity tariffs in Germany

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103978
Vincent Weidenbörner , Marvin Gleue , Christoph Feldhaus , Madeline Werthschulte
{"title":"Which tariff to choose? How individual attitudes and preferences explain demand for flexible electricity tariffs in Germany","authors":"Vincent Weidenbörner ,&nbsp;Marvin Gleue ,&nbsp;Christoph Feldhaus ,&nbsp;Madeline Werthschulte","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Time-variant pricing and voluntary flexibility in private energy consumption have the potential to enhance demand sensitivity in electricity markets, playing crucial roles in the transition towards a greener energy system. This paper uses survey methods to examine the determinants of the stated willingness to adopt time-variant electricity tariffs. Based on a large population sample (N = 1200) from the most populous German federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia, we differentiate between the general willingness to adopt such tariffs and specific types, including time-of-use (TOU), critical-peak-pricing (CPP), and real-time-pricing (RTP) tariffs. Additionally, participants provide information on their willingness to adjust their electricity consumption in a timely manner. Our findings reveal that the stated willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs decreases as the potential price volatility increases. Moreover, there is a strong positive correlation between the willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs and the willingness to provide energy demand flexibility. The results of our analysis further indicate that early adopters of energy-efficient technologies and supporters of climate policies are more inclined towards time-variant pricing and providing flexibility in their electricity consumption. Economic preferences, such as loss aversion and present bias, appear to be particularly relevant for adopting the RTP tariff. These insights offer valuable guidance for promoting time-variant tariffs and flexible energy consumption, facilitating the adoption of efficient and sustainable energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103978"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000593","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time-variant pricing and voluntary flexibility in private energy consumption have the potential to enhance demand sensitivity in electricity markets, playing crucial roles in the transition towards a greener energy system. This paper uses survey methods to examine the determinants of the stated willingness to adopt time-variant electricity tariffs. Based on a large population sample (N = 1200) from the most populous German federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia, we differentiate between the general willingness to adopt such tariffs and specific types, including time-of-use (TOU), critical-peak-pricing (CPP), and real-time-pricing (RTP) tariffs. Additionally, participants provide information on their willingness to adjust their electricity consumption in a timely manner. Our findings reveal that the stated willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs decreases as the potential price volatility increases. Moreover, there is a strong positive correlation between the willingness to adopt time-variant tariffs and the willingness to provide energy demand flexibility. The results of our analysis further indicate that early adopters of energy-efficient technologies and supporters of climate policies are more inclined towards time-variant pricing and providing flexibility in their electricity consumption. Economic preferences, such as loss aversion and present bias, appear to be particularly relevant for adopting the RTP tariff. These insights offer valuable guidance for promoting time-variant tariffs and flexible energy consumption, facilitating the adoption of efficient and sustainable energy systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择哪种关税?个人态度和偏好如何解释德国对灵活电价的需求
时变定价和私人能源消费的自愿灵活性有可能提高电力市场的需求敏感性,在向绿色能源系统过渡方面发挥关键作用。本文采用问卷调查的方法来检验采用时变电价的陈述意愿的决定因素。基于来自人口最多的德国联邦州北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州的大量人口样本(N = 1200),我们区分了采用此类关税的一般意愿和特定类型,包括使用时间(TOU),关键峰值定价(CPP)和实时定价(RTP)关税。此外,参加者亦提供资料,说明他们是否愿意适时调整用电量。我们的研究结果表明,随着潜在价格波动的增加,采用时变关税的意愿降低。此外,采用时变电价的意愿与提供能源需求灵活性的意愿之间存在很强的正相关关系。我们的分析结果进一步表明,节能技术的早期采用者和气候政策的支持者更倾向于时变定价,并在电力消费中提供灵活性。经济偏好,如损失厌恶和当前偏见,似乎与采用区域贸易协定关税特别相关。这些见解为促进时变电价和灵活的能源消费,促进采用高效和可持续的能源系统提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Beyond yes and no: Clustering public perceptions of wave energy on the West Coast of the United States Reclaiming the wind: Indigenous windmills in Iran and their lessons for renewable energy From tension to transformation in Dutch heat transitions: Leveraging time, transparency, and relationships “Might give some hope for the future”: Understanding young adults' support for offshore wind in coastal Australia Solving the puzzle of justice: How to bridge the normative and descriptive logics in energy justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1