Jazz hands and jitters: Exploring valence and arousal dimensions with multidimensional scaling techniques

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112930
Sarah A. Jessup , Gene M. Alarcon , Scott K. Meyers , Krista N. Harris , August Capiola , Jacob Noblick
{"title":"Jazz hands and jitters: Exploring valence and arousal dimensions with multidimensional scaling techniques","authors":"Sarah A. Jessup ,&nbsp;Gene M. Alarcon ,&nbsp;Scott K. Meyers ,&nbsp;Krista N. Harris ,&nbsp;August Capiola ,&nbsp;Jacob Noblick","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Utilizing the two-dimensional plane of valence and arousal with multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), the current study sought to better understand the structure of affect and the relationship between emotion items. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is the most frequently applied self-report measure of affect but has been criticized for only including high arousal emotions. A between-subjects, two-part experimental study was conducted. Participants (<em>N</em> = 548) were recruited online and asked to rate the similarity between one of two target words (anger: <em>n</em> = 271; calm: <em>n</em> = 277) and 143 emotion words. Our results provided evidence for the two-dimensional plane of valence and arousal, indicating that all four quadrants are important when studying affect. Overall, the current study found support for the activation-arousal theory of affectivity with MDS analyses. Emotion words clustered in all four quadrants of the two-dimensional plane, demonstrating the necessity of an affect measure that encompasses all four quadrants. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the PANAS does not include items in the positive valence/low activation quadrant, however, a newly published measure was found to have increased item dispersion, with items included in all four quadrants of affect. Limitations and proposed future directions are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112930"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilizing the two-dimensional plane of valence and arousal with multi-dimensional scaling (MDS), the current study sought to better understand the structure of affect and the relationship between emotion items. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) is the most frequently applied self-report measure of affect but has been criticized for only including high arousal emotions. A between-subjects, two-part experimental study was conducted. Participants (N = 548) were recruited online and asked to rate the similarity between one of two target words (anger: n = 271; calm: n = 277) and 143 emotion words. Our results provided evidence for the two-dimensional plane of valence and arousal, indicating that all four quadrants are important when studying affect. Overall, the current study found support for the activation-arousal theory of affectivity with MDS analyses. Emotion words clustered in all four quadrants of the two-dimensional plane, demonstrating the necessity of an affect measure that encompasses all four quadrants. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the PANAS does not include items in the positive valence/low activation quadrant, however, a newly published measure was found to have increased item dispersion, with items included in all four quadrants of affect. Limitations and proposed future directions are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爵士乐手和抖动:利用多维缩放技术探索情绪和唤醒维度
本研究利用多维标度(MDS)的情绪和唤醒的二维平面,试图更好地了解情绪的结构和情绪项目之间的关系。积极和消极情绪表(PANAS)是最常用的自我报告情绪测量方法,但因只包括高唤醒情绪而饱受批评。我们进行了一项主体间两部分实验研究。我们在网上招募了参与者(548 人),要求他们对两个目标词(愤怒:271 人;平静:277 人)中的一个词与 143 个情绪词之间的相似度进行评分。我们的研究结果为情绪和唤醒的二维平面提供了证据,表明在研究情绪时,所有四个象限都很重要。总体而言,本研究通过 MDS 分析发现,激活-唤醒情感理论得到了支持。情感词聚集在二维平面的所有四个象限,这表明情感测量必须涵盖所有四个象限。此外,我们的研究结果表明,PANAS 不包括正价/低激活象限的项目,然而,我们发现新发布的测量方法增加了项目的分散性,所有四个象限的项目都包括在内。本文讨论了该研究的局限性和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
The Golden Mean Inventory: A new approach to studying character strengths imbalances across contexts Inside Front Cover - Ed. Board, Aims and Scope, Copyright, Publication information, Orders and Claims, Advertising information, Author inquiries, Permissions, Funding body, Permanence of paper, Impressum (German titles only) and GFA link in double column ISSID Pages The number of exceptional people: Fewer than 85 per 1 million across key traits Priming moral self-ambivalence facilitates cognitive flexibility in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1