From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113107
Zhen Liu , Li Liu , Jianning Dang , Cong Wei , Chao Li , Xiaoyan Miao , Xinying Jiang
{"title":"From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification","authors":"Zhen Liu ,&nbsp;Li Liu ,&nbsp;Jianning Dang ,&nbsp;Cong Wei ,&nbsp;Chao Li ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Miao ,&nbsp;Xinying Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (<em>N</em> <sub>country =</sub> 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (N country = 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从自利到群体利益:马基雅维利主义根据群体内认同助长了群体间偏见
马基雅维利主义包含了一种对自己胜过他人的偏好,这一事实已被充分证明。然而,这种自我中心是否会延伸到一种倾向,即偏袒自己的内部群体而不是外部群体,目前还没有答案。通过将社会认同理论与马基雅维利主义文献相结合,我们提出并验证了马基雅维利主义导致个人在强烈认同其内部群体的个人中倾向于自己的内部群体而非外部群体(一种被称为群体间偏见的现象)的假设。研究1 (N个国家= 43)依赖于世界价值观调查和开放心理测量项目的数据,提供了国家层面和跨层面的证据来支持我们的假设。研究2对400名中国大学生进行了调查,在校际背景下的个体层面上支持了这一假设。研究3对374名美国人进行了预先登记的调查,证实了我们在跨种族和跨党派背景下的发现。研究3还显示,在高标识符(相对于低标识符)中,马基雅维利主义通过减少对内部群体的消极态度,积极地预测了群体间偏见。我们的发现通过将马基雅维利主义与群体间偏见联系起来,扩展了马基雅维利主义的研究,从群体间的角度提供了理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Moral foundations in the 2020s: Advancements in measurement, genetics, brain science, and real-world impact Interpersonal stressors, interpersonal sensitivity, and loneliness among college students: Disentangling between- and within-person associations Sociosexuality in men and women: Considering core self-judgments and (im)moral orientations Individual differences in adolescents' digital well-being: How perceived stress, fear of missing out, and self-control interact in daily life Is consideration of future consequences consistent across specific domains? A latent profile analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1