Zhen Liu , Li Liu , Jianning Dang , Cong Wei , Chao Li , Xiaoyan Miao , Xinying Jiang
{"title":"From self-interest to group interest: Machiavellianism fuels intergroup bias depending on ingroup identification","authors":"Zhen Liu , Li Liu , Jianning Dang , Cong Wei , Chao Li , Xiaoyan Miao , Xinying Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (<em>N</em> <sub>country =</sub> 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 113107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000698","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The fact that Machiavellianism entails a preference for oneself over others has been well documented. However, whether this self-centeredness extends to a tendency to favor one's ingroup over outgroups remains unanswered. By integrating social identity theory with the Machiavellianism literature, we propose and test the hypothesis that Machiavellianism leads individuals to favor their ingroup over outgroups (a phenomenon known as intergroup bias) among individuals who identify strongly with their ingroups. Study 1 (Ncountry = 43), which relied on data drawn from the World Values Survey and the Open Psychometrics Project, provided both national-level and cross-level evidence supporting our hypothesis. Study 2, which surveyed 400 Chinese university students, supported the hypothesis at the individual level in inter-university contexts. Study 3, which involved a preregistered survey of 374 Americans, confirmed our findings in both interracial and interparty contexts. Study 3 also revealed that among high (vs. low) identifiers, Machiavellianism positively predicted intergroup bias by reducing negativity toward the ingroup. Our findings extend Machiavellianism research by linking it to intergroup bias, offering theoretical and practical implications from an intergroup perspective.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.