Lili Meng, Sara Öberg, Anna Sandström, Marie Reilly
{"title":"Association between infertility and cervical insufficiency in nulliparous women- the contribution of fertility treatment.","authors":"Lili Meng, Sara Öberg, Anna Sandström, Marie Reilly","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancies conceived through assisted reproduction have been associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy and delivery outcomes, including cervical insufficiency (CI). Despite CI being a significant cause of late miscarriage or preterm birth, there are minimal published data on the associations of infertility (with or without fertility treatment) with CI. This study uses Swedish national health registers to examine the associations between infertility, assisted reproduction and CI in nulliparous women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based case-control study is based on data from Swedish national health registers. Using the information on parity and multiple gestation in the Medical Birth Register, singleton pregnancies of nulliparous women were extracted and linked to the National Patient Register and the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction. Using diagnostic codes for CI and procedural codes for cervical cerclage, a total of 2662 CI cases were identified for deliveries in the 21-year period, 1992-2012. A reference group of 26,620 controls were extracted from the population of non-cases using simple random sampling.. Infertility was classified using a woman's report of difficulty conceiving for at least one year. Fertility treatment was assessed through self-reported variables in the Medical Birth Register and fertility treatment registration in the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On adjusting for maternal characteristics and medical history, infertility was associated with CI, overall (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) ) 1.91 (1.53, 2.39) and in the subgroup of non-users of fertility treatment (aOR) 1.60 (1.21, 2.12), compared to women without infertility. Among women with infertility, pregnancies conceived with the aid of fertility treatment had higher risk of CI than naturally-conceived pregnancies (aOR 1.49 (1.05, 2.10). In the subgroup of women with infertility and no history of miscarriage, the use of fertility treatment was associated with CI (aOR 3.48 (2.02. 5.98)). No association was found between fertility treatment and CI in the pregnancies of women with infertility and a history of miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From this study, we conclude that CI in nulliparous women is associated with both infertility and its treatment. For infertile women, the risk of CI following fertility treatment was seen only in those with no history of miscarriage, providing crucial information for improving risk assessment and management strategies for preterm birth prevention in populations availing of fertility treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pregnancies conceived through assisted reproduction have been associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy and delivery outcomes, including cervical insufficiency (CI). Despite CI being a significant cause of late miscarriage or preterm birth, there are minimal published data on the associations of infertility (with or without fertility treatment) with CI. This study uses Swedish national health registers to examine the associations between infertility, assisted reproduction and CI in nulliparous women.
Methods: This population-based case-control study is based on data from Swedish national health registers. Using the information on parity and multiple gestation in the Medical Birth Register, singleton pregnancies of nulliparous women were extracted and linked to the National Patient Register and the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction. Using diagnostic codes for CI and procedural codes for cervical cerclage, a total of 2662 CI cases were identified for deliveries in the 21-year period, 1992-2012. A reference group of 26,620 controls were extracted from the population of non-cases using simple random sampling.. Infertility was classified using a woman's report of difficulty conceiving for at least one year. Fertility treatment was assessed through self-reported variables in the Medical Birth Register and fertility treatment registration in the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction.
Results: On adjusting for maternal characteristics and medical history, infertility was associated with CI, overall (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) ) 1.91 (1.53, 2.39) and in the subgroup of non-users of fertility treatment (aOR) 1.60 (1.21, 2.12), compared to women without infertility. Among women with infertility, pregnancies conceived with the aid of fertility treatment had higher risk of CI than naturally-conceived pregnancies (aOR 1.49 (1.05, 2.10). In the subgroup of women with infertility and no history of miscarriage, the use of fertility treatment was associated with CI (aOR 3.48 (2.02. 5.98)). No association was found between fertility treatment and CI in the pregnancies of women with infertility and a history of miscarriage.
Conclusions: From this study, we conclude that CI in nulliparous women is associated with both infertility and its treatment. For infertile women, the risk of CI following fertility treatment was seen only in those with no history of miscarriage, providing crucial information for improving risk assessment and management strategies for preterm birth prevention in populations availing of fertility treatment.
背景:通过辅助生殖技术怀孕会增加不良妊娠和分娩结局的风险,包括宫颈机能不全(CI)。尽管宫颈机能不全是导致晚期流产或早产的一个重要原因,但关于不孕症(无论是否接受过生育治疗)与宫颈机能不全的相关性的公开数据却很少。本研究利用瑞典全国健康登记册,对无子宫妇女的不孕症、辅助生殖和CI之间的关系进行了研究:这项基于人群的病例对照研究以瑞典全国健康登记数据为基础。利用出生医学登记册中关于奇偶性和多胎妊娠的信息,提取了无子宫妇女的单胎妊娠信息,并将其与国家患者登记册和国家辅助生殖质量登记册相链接。利用 CI 诊断代码和宫颈环扎术的程序代码,确定了 1992-2012 年 21 年间分娩的总共 2662 例 CI 病例。通过简单随机抽样,从非病例人群中提取了 26620 个对照组。不孕症的分类是根据妇女报告的至少一年的受孕困难来确定的。不孕症治疗通过出生医学登记册中的自我报告变量和国家辅助生殖质量登记册中的不孕症治疗登记进行评估:在对母亲特征和病史进行调整后,不孕症与 CI 的总体相关性(调整后的几率比(aOR)1.91 (1.53, 2.39)),在未使用生育治疗的亚组(aOR)为 1.60 (1.21, 2.12))。在不孕症妇女中,与自然怀孕相比,借助生育治疗怀孕的妇女发生 CI 的风险更高(aOR:1.49(1.05,2.10))。在不孕且无流产史的妇女亚组中,使用生育治疗与 CI 相关(aOR 3.48 (2.02. 5.98))。在患有不孕症且有流产史的妇女的妊娠中,未发现生育治疗与 CI 相关:从这项研究中,我们得出结论,无子宫妇女的 CI 与不孕症及其治疗有关。对于不孕妇女来说,只有那些没有流产史的妇女在接受生育治疗后才会有 CI 风险,这为改进风险评估和管理策略以预防接受生育治疗人群的早产提供了重要信息。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.