Lily Chartrand, Keith J Barrington, Philippe Dodin, Andréanne Villeneuve
{"title":"Delayed cord clamping in preterm twin infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lily Chartrand, Keith J Barrington, Philippe Dodin, Andréanne Villeneuve","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of delayed cord clamping (DCC) versus early cord clamping (EDD) on all-cause in-hospital mortality and selected morbidities among preterm twin neonates.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane database, Web of Science and CINAHL was conducted in December 2023 for studies comparing DCC to ICC in preterm twin neonates.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies were deemed eligible if they included preterm twin neonates (< 37 weeks of gestation), compared delayed (≥ 30 seconds) vs early (<30 seconds) umbilical cord clamping at delivery and described at least one outcome of interest. Outcomes of interest were mortality, maternal hemorrhage, transfusion, severe interventricular hemorrhage (grade III or IV), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity (stage IV or receiving treatment) and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed bias and extracted data. Risk ratio and mean difference with 95% confidence intervals were determined by fixed effects models, heterogeneity by I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies compared DCC vs ECC in 2075 infants. Meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in mortality [(RR) 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.93)], a significant decrease in the risk of red blood cell transfusion [(RR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.28 - 0.64)] as well as a lower risk of retinopathy of prematurity [(RR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.26-0.96)] with DCC in twin population. DCC had no impact on the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage [(RR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.79, 1.28)], of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [(RR) 0.67 (95% CI 0.36, 1.24)], of necrotizing enterocolitis [(RR) 1.02 (95% CI 0.60, 1.73)]. There was no significant effect on length of hospital stay [-0.10 (-0.20, -0.00)]. None reported maternal hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCC may decrease mortality risk in preterm twin infants without affecting major neonatal morbidities. Further evidence is needed to support its safety in preterm twins.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2024.10.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of delayed cord clamping (DCC) versus early cord clamping (EDD) on all-cause in-hospital mortality and selected morbidities among preterm twin neonates.
Data sources: A search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane database, Web of Science and CINAHL was conducted in December 2023 for studies comparing DCC to ICC in preterm twin neonates.
Study eligibility criteria: Studies were deemed eligible if they included preterm twin neonates (< 37 weeks of gestation), compared delayed (≥ 30 seconds) vs early (<30 seconds) umbilical cord clamping at delivery and described at least one outcome of interest. Outcomes of interest were mortality, maternal hemorrhage, transfusion, severe interventricular hemorrhage (grade III or IV), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity (stage IV or receiving treatment) and length of hospital stay.
Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed bias and extracted data. Risk ratio and mean difference with 95% confidence intervals were determined by fixed effects models, heterogeneity by I2 statistics.
Results: Five studies compared DCC vs ECC in 2075 infants. Meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in mortality [(RR) 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.93)], a significant decrease in the risk of red blood cell transfusion [(RR) 0.42 (95% CI 0.28 - 0.64)] as well as a lower risk of retinopathy of prematurity [(RR) 0.50 (95% CI 0.26-0.96)] with DCC in twin population. DCC had no impact on the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage [(RR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.79, 1.28)], of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [(RR) 0.67 (95% CI 0.36, 1.24)], of necrotizing enterocolitis [(RR) 1.02 (95% CI 0.60, 1.73)]. There was no significant effect on length of hospital stay [-0.10 (-0.20, -0.00)]. None reported maternal hemorrhage.
Conclusion: DCC may decrease mortality risk in preterm twin infants without affecting major neonatal morbidities. Further evidence is needed to support its safety in preterm twins.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.