{"title":"Comparison of Food Safety Hazards in Pigs and Broilers from Intensive and Extensive Production Systems: A Literature Review","authors":"Rosa A. Safitri, Esther D. van Asselt","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumer demand for meat from extensive production (e.g., organic, free-range, and antimicrobial-free) is increasing, partly due to consumers’ perception that these types are safer than conventional meats. This review compared food safety hazards (namely, zoonotic parasites, bacterial pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, and chemical hazards) from pigs and broilers raised in intensive and extensive systems in Northern and Western European countries and the United States. Our findings showed that hazard occurrence between livestock production systems varied depending on the hazard. Pigs and broilers from extensive systems showed a higher prevalence of <em>Toxoplasma gondii</em>. Pathogen prevalence in pigs did not appear to be affected by production systems, while no clear conclusion could be drawn for broilers due to conflicting findings. Higher antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevalence was common in pig and broiler samples from intensive farming, although samples from extensive farming were not free of AMR either. Studies on chemical hazards were limited, showing generally low contaminant levels in both production systems, including persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, mycotoxins, pesticide residues, and antimicrobial residues. Therefore, more studies on chemical hazards are recommended to fill this data gap. Various factors associated with specific production systems could influence hazard prevalence, e.g., indoor confinement, outdoor access, antimicrobial policy, and slaughtering age. Regardless of the production system, other factors, such as seasonal variation and biosecurity levels, were also important.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400173X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consumer demand for meat from extensive production (e.g., organic, free-range, and antimicrobial-free) is increasing, partly due to consumers’ perception that these types are safer than conventional meats. This review compared food safety hazards (namely, zoonotic parasites, bacterial pathogens, antimicrobial resistance, and chemical hazards) from pigs and broilers raised in intensive and extensive systems in Northern and Western European countries and the United States. Our findings showed that hazard occurrence between livestock production systems varied depending on the hazard. Pigs and broilers from extensive systems showed a higher prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii. Pathogen prevalence in pigs did not appear to be affected by production systems, while no clear conclusion could be drawn for broilers due to conflicting findings. Higher antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevalence was common in pig and broiler samples from intensive farming, although samples from extensive farming were not free of AMR either. Studies on chemical hazards were limited, showing generally low contaminant levels in both production systems, including persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, mycotoxins, pesticide residues, and antimicrobial residues. Therefore, more studies on chemical hazards are recommended to fill this data gap. Various factors associated with specific production systems could influence hazard prevalence, e.g., indoor confinement, outdoor access, antimicrobial policy, and slaughtering age. Regardless of the production system, other factors, such as seasonal variation and biosecurity levels, were also important.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.