Pleasantness makes a good time: musical consonance shapes interpersonal synchronization in dyadic joint action.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1472632
Giorgio Lazzari, Lucia Maria Sacheli, Charles-Etienne Benoit, Carlotta Lega, Floris T van Vugt
{"title":"Pleasantness makes a good time: musical consonance shapes interpersonal synchronization in dyadic joint action.","authors":"Giorgio Lazzari, Lucia Maria Sacheli, Charles-Etienne Benoit, Carlotta Lega, Floris T van Vugt","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1472632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Music making is a process by which humans across cultures come together to create patterns of sounds that are aesthetically pleasing. What remains unclear is how this aesthetic outcome affects the sensorimotor interaction between participants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Here we approach this question using an interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization paradigm to test whether the quality of a jointly created chord (consonant vs. dissonant) affects movement coordination. We recruited non-musician participants in dyads to perform a dyadic synchronization-continuation task (dSCT): on each trial, participants first synchronized their movements to a metronome (synchronization phase) and then continued tapping together at the same tempo without the metronome (continuation phase). Each tap yielded a note and participants heard both their own and that of their partner, thus creating a chord that was varied to be either consonant (Perf5 or Maj6) or dissonant (Min2 or Maj2). For each trial, participants also rated the pleasure they felt in creating the sounds together. Additionally, they completed questionnaires about social closeness to the other participant, musical reward sensitivity and musical training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that participants' taps were closer in time when they jointly created consonant (high pleasure) vs. dissonant (low pleasure) chords, and that pleasure experienced by the dyad in each trial predicted interpersonal synchronization. However, consonance did not affect individual synchronization with the metronome or individual tapping when the metronome was discontinued. The effect of consonance on synchronization was greater in dyads who reported feeling less close prior to the task.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Together, these results highlight the role of consonance in shaping the temporal coordination of our actions with others. More broadly, this work shows that the aesthetic outcome of what we create together affects joint behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1472632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1472632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Music making is a process by which humans across cultures come together to create patterns of sounds that are aesthetically pleasing. What remains unclear is how this aesthetic outcome affects the sensorimotor interaction between participants.

Method: Here we approach this question using an interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization paradigm to test whether the quality of a jointly created chord (consonant vs. dissonant) affects movement coordination. We recruited non-musician participants in dyads to perform a dyadic synchronization-continuation task (dSCT): on each trial, participants first synchronized their movements to a metronome (synchronization phase) and then continued tapping together at the same tempo without the metronome (continuation phase). Each tap yielded a note and participants heard both their own and that of their partner, thus creating a chord that was varied to be either consonant (Perf5 or Maj6) or dissonant (Min2 or Maj2). For each trial, participants also rated the pleasure they felt in creating the sounds together. Additionally, they completed questionnaires about social closeness to the other participant, musical reward sensitivity and musical training.

Results: Results showed that participants' taps were closer in time when they jointly created consonant (high pleasure) vs. dissonant (low pleasure) chords, and that pleasure experienced by the dyad in each trial predicted interpersonal synchronization. However, consonance did not affect individual synchronization with the metronome or individual tapping when the metronome was discontinued. The effect of consonance on synchronization was greater in dyads who reported feeling less close prior to the task.

Discussion: Together, these results highlight the role of consonance in shaping the temporal coordination of our actions with others. More broadly, this work shows that the aesthetic outcome of what we create together affects joint behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
愉悦带来美好时光:音乐共鸣塑造了双人联合行动中的人际同步。
简介音乐创作是不同文化背景的人类共同创造出具有美感的声音模式的过程。目前尚不清楚的是,这种审美结果如何影响参与者之间的感觉运动互动:在此,我们使用人际感应运动同步范式来探讨这一问题,以测试共同创作的和弦(协和与不协和)的质量是否会影响动作协调。我们招募了非音乐家参与者组成二人组,共同完成一项二人组同步-延续任务(dSCT):在每次试验中,参与者首先将他们的动作与节拍器同步(同步阶段),然后在没有节拍器的情况下以相同的节奏继续敲击(延续阶段)。每次敲击都会产生一个音符,参与者既能听到自己的音符,也能听到同伴的音符,这样就形成了一个和弦,这个和弦可以是协和的(Perf5 或 Maj6),也可以是不协和的(Min2 或 Maj2)。在每次试验中,参与者还对他们在共同创造声音时感受到的愉悦程度进行评分。此外,他们还填写了关于与其他参与者的社交亲密度、音乐奖励敏感度和音乐训练的问卷:结果表明,当参与者共同创造协和(高愉悦感)和弦与不协和(低愉悦感)和弦时,他们的敲击时间更接近,而且每次试验中二人体验到的愉悦感预示着人际间的同步性。然而,当节拍器停止时,共鸣并不影响个人与节拍器的同步或个人敲击。在任务前感觉不太亲密的二人组中,共鸣对同步的影响更大:总之,这些结果凸显了共鸣在塑造我们与他人行动的时间协调方面所起的作用。更广泛地说,这项研究表明,我们共同创造的美学结果会影响共同行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive and cortical network alterations in pediatric temporal lobe space-occupying lesions: an fMRI study. Advancing working memory research through cortico-cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain spatial reconciliation through multisensory integration in the impact of pandemic fatigue on workplace. Cognitive dysfunction in Moyamoya disease: latest developments and future directions. Development and validation of a two-dimensional pseudorandom balance perturbation test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1